Schoretsanitis G, Melissas J, Sanidas E, Christodoulakis M, Vlachonikolis J G, Tsiftsis D D
Department of Surgical Oncology, University General Hospital, Herakleion, Crete, Greece.
Am Surg. 1998 Aug;64(8):778-80.
A prospective randomized study questioning the benefit of neck drainage in thyroid surgery is presented. Two hundred consecutive patients, candidates for elective thyroid surgery, were randomized into Group A (no drain) and Group B (drain). Reoperation for bleeding was necessary for two patients of Group A and for one patient in Group B. Minor hematomas occurred in seven patients from Group A and five patients from Group B; wound infection occurred in two and four patients in Groups A and B, respectively; and lymphatic discharge occurred in two patients from Group B. These differences were not statistically different. The present study failed to demonstrate any protective value from the use of drains. However, the hospital stay was shorter and pain scores were smaller in the non-drain Group A.
本文呈现了一项前瞻性随机研究,该研究对甲状腺手术中颈部引流的益处提出质疑。连续200例择期甲状腺手术患者被随机分为A组(不引流)和B组(引流)。A组有2例患者因出血需要再次手术,B组有1例患者因出血需要再次手术。A组有7例患者出现小血肿,B组有5例患者出现小血肿;A组有2例患者发生伤口感染,B组有4例患者发生伤口感染;B组有2例患者出现淋巴液渗出。这些差异无统计学意义。本研究未能证明引流具有任何保护作用。然而,不引流的A组住院时间更短,疼痛评分更低。