Shimizu Y, Kamoi S, Amada S, Hasumi K, Akiyama F, Silverberg S G
Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Jul;70(1):2-12. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5051.
Because there is no universally accepted grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma, we attempted to compare the prognostic utility of the individual components used in some systems--both architectural and cytologic features, as well as mitotic activity and histologic tumor type--to determine which of these components fit best with survival.
We studied 461 patients with invasive ovarian carcinoma who had uniform treatment, complete clinical data including staging and follow-up, and slides available for review. Each tumor was assigned a histologic subtype, architectural grade (based on whether the predominant pattern was glandular, papillary or solid), nuclear grade, mitotic count, and FIGO grade (based on the system for endometrial carcinoma). These features were compared with each other and with tumor stage and survival.
The architectural grade, nuclear grade, and mitotic count were independent variables both in stage I/II and stage III/IV disease. Each of them correlated with survival for most combinations of histologic type and stage. By multivariate analysis, in stage I/II cancer, nuclear grade and architectural grade were significantly correlated with survival, mitotic count showed only a trend, and FIGO grade did not correlate. In stage III/IV disease, nuclear grade, architectural grade 3, and mitotic count were significant, and FIGO grade was not.
The new architectural grading system proposed worked better than the FIGO system in this study. Furthermore, it could be applied to all histologic subtypes of carcinoma. The nuclear grade and mitotic count were also independent of each other, correlated with survival, and could be utilized for all histologic types. These data support the development of a grading system which combines these architectural, nuclear, and mitotic features and can be applied regardless of the histologic type of carcinoma, modeled after the Nottingham system for grading of breast carcinoma.
由于目前尚无被广泛接受的卵巢上皮癌分级系统,我们试图比较一些分级系统中各组成部分(包括结构和细胞学特征、有丝分裂活性及组织学肿瘤类型)的预后评估价值,以确定哪些组成部分与生存情况最为契合。
我们研究了461例浸润性卵巢癌患者,这些患者接受了统一治疗,拥有包括分期和随访在内的完整临床数据,且有可供复查的切片。每例肿瘤都被确定了组织学亚型、结构分级(基于主要模式是腺管状、乳头状还是实性)、核分级、有丝分裂计数以及国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分级(基于子宫内膜癌的分级系统)。将这些特征相互比较,并与肿瘤分期和生存情况进行比较。
在Ⅰ/Ⅱ期和Ⅲ/Ⅳ期疾病中,结构分级、核分级和有丝分裂计数均为独立变量。对于大多数组织学类型和分期的组合,它们各自都与生存情况相关。通过多因素分析,在Ⅰ/Ⅱ期癌症中,核分级和结构分级与生存情况显著相关,有丝分裂计数仅显示出一种趋势,而FIGO分级与生存情况无关。在Ⅲ/Ⅳ期疾病中,核分级、结构3级和有丝分裂计数具有显著性,而FIGO分级则不然。
在本研究中,新提出的结构分级系统比FIGO系统表现更佳。此外,它可应用于所有癌的组织学亚型。核分级和有丝分裂计数也相互独立,与生存情况相关,且可用于所有组织学类型。这些数据支持开发一种结合这些结构、核和有丝分裂特征的分级系统,该系统可应用于任何组织学类型的癌,可仿照诺丁汉乳腺癌分级系统进行构建。