Suppr超能文献

一项为期5年的多机构临床试验中后牙树脂粘结桥的风险因素及多次失败情况

Risk factors and multiple failures in posterior resin-bonded bridges in a 5-year multi-practice clinical trial.

作者信息

Creugers N H, De Kanter R J, Verzijden C W, Van't Hof M A

机构信息

Department of Occlusal Reconstruction and Oral Function, College of Dental Science, Medical Faculty, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Dent. 1998 Jul-Aug;26(5-6):397-402. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00028-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A randomized controlled clinical trial was undertaken, to study the influence of some patient- and operator-dependent variables on the survival of posterior resin-bonded bridges (PRBBs) and to assess the survival of replacement' PRBBs. This report contains some of the results of the 5-year analysis.

METHODS

Survival was defined at three levels: (1) complete survival (without any debonding), (2) functional survival (i.e. survival after one loss of retention) and (3) replacement survival (survival of 'replacement' PRBBs, inserted after rebonded bridges suffered a second dislodgement). Potential risk factors were analysed with Cox's proportional hazards model and differences were tested for significance with the Breslow test. Observed effects are expressed as conditional-relative-risk (CRR). Survival of 'replacement' PRBBs was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Factors showing significant influences on complete survival were: 'location' (highest risk for mandibular PRBBs: CRR = 2.2), 'aetiology' (higher risk in treatment of aplasia: CRR = 2.9), and 'time of existence' (open spaces existing less than 2 years before insertion of PRBB: CRR: 2.0). The factor 'large open spaces in the mandible' was a risk for both complete and functional survival (CCR values 3.1 and 3.5, respectively). The survival of mandibular and maxillary 'replacement' PRBBs after 5 years was 19 +/- 7% and 31 +/- 18%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for PRBBs were: 'location', 'aetiology', 'time of existence', 'isolation method' and 'large open spaces in the mandible'. Mandibular 'replacement' PRBBs showed such an unacceptably low survival rate that fabrication is not recommended.

摘要

目的

开展一项随机对照临床试验,以研究一些患者和操作者相关变量对后牙树脂粘结桥(PRBBs)存留率的影响,并评估置换PRBBs的存留率。本报告包含了5年分析的部分结果。

方法

存留率定义为三个水平:(1)完全存留(无任何脱粘),(2)功能存留(即一次固位丧失后的存留),(3)置换存留(在重新粘结的桥体发生第二次脱位后插入的“置换”PRBBs的存留)。使用Cox比例风险模型分析潜在风险因素,并通过Breslow检验对差异进行显著性检验。观察到的效应以条件相对风险(CRR)表示。使用Kaplan-Meier方法评估“置换”PRBBs的存留率。

结果

对完全存留率有显著影响的因素包括:“位置”(下颌PRBBs风险最高:CRR = 2.2)、“病因”(发育不全治疗中风险较高:CRR = 2.9)以及“存在时间”(在PRBBs植入前开放间隙存在时间少于2年:CRR = 2.0)。“下颌大开放间隙”因素对完全存留和功能存留均构成风险(CCR值分别为3.1和3.5)。下颌和上颌“置换”PRBBs 5年后的存留率分别为19±7%和31±18%。

结论

PRBBs的风险因素包括:“位置”、“病因”、“存在时间”、“隔离方法”以及“下颌大开放间隙”。下颌“置换”PRBBs的存留率低得令人无法接受,因此不建议制作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验