Noble R, Bovey A
Bayside Breastfeeding Clinic, Brisbane, Australia.
Breastfeed Rev. 1997;5(2):37-42.
Much has been written about suck confusion due to a baby's oral experience with objects other than the breast--but how much difference is there in the relative impacts on a baby's ineffective suck if a teat is used instead of other currently accepted techniques such as cup and finger feeding? Mothers who seek the help of a lactation consultant will commonly already be using bottles and teats as part of their management regime for a difficult situation. Especially if the problems are well developed and complex, many mothers will not be able to accept unfamiliar alternatives such as cup and finger feeding and prefer to wean rather than do so. Current teat designs have evolved with no reference to Woolridge's landmark research published over ten years ago which clearly demonstrated how normal breastfeeding works. Rather, manufacturers offer consumers an array of teats which have been shortened in length and distorted in conformation when compared with teats available thirty years ago which coincidentally were a closer physiological match with the positioning of the nipple and breast tissues in the mouth of a breastfeeding baby than teats designed and produced since then. Fortunately one UK manufacturer still markets this thirty year old style of teat in a flow rate suitable for very young babies. Over a three year period, we at first hesitantly, but with increasing confidence asked mothers to use this teat when suck retraining and supplementation were indicated. We are able to report that use of these teats has resulted in a success rate in excess of 90% converting babies with significant sucking problems into fully effective breastfeeders.
