Iwasaki T, Ku Y, Kusunoki N, Tominaga M, Fukumoto T, Muramatsu S, Kuroda Y
First Department of Surgery, Kobe University School of Medicine, Japan.
Cancer Res. 1998 Aug 1;58(15):3339-43.
We evaluated the regional pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin after hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) and portal venous infusion (PVI) using a novel system for hepatic venous isolation and charcoal hemoperfusion (HVI-CHP). The HVI-CHP system was used to determine directly the doxorubicin plasma concentration in the hepatic vein and the hepatic venous flow rate, and simultaneously, to eliminate hepatic re-entry of the drug. Beagles received doxorubicin (1 mg/kg) through either the hepatic artery (HAI group, n = 6) or the portal vein (PVI group, n = 6). In both groups, hepatic venous blood was completely isolated and directed to the CHP filter. The filtered blood was returned through the left jugular vein. During HVI-CHP, the hepatic venous flow rate was monitored and plasma doxorubicin concentrations were serially measured in prefilter (= hepatic venous), postfilter, and systemic blood. The hepatic tissue uptake of doxorubicin was determined based on the blood flow rate and doxorubicin level in the hepatic vein. The hepatic extraction ratio of doxorubicin was defined as the percentage hepatic tissue uptake to the amount of drug administered. During drug infusion, similarly in either group, HVI-CHP produced a 66-87% reduction of the postfilter doxorubicin level as compared with the prefilter level. The prefilter drug level was significantly lower in HAI group than in PVI group (P < 0.01). Thus, the area under the time concentration curve for the prefilter drug level in the HAI group (6.90+/-0.96 microg min/ml) was significantly lower than that in the PVI group (18.10+/-2.90 microg min/ml, P < 0.01). Conversely, the hepatic extraction ratio in the HAI group (84.6+/-2.9%) was significantly higher than that in the PVI group (58.1+/-3.4%, P < 0.01). We conclude that in the beagle, doxorubicin is more effectively extracted by the liver when administered via the hepatic artery than when administered via the portal vein. These results indicate that HAI of doxorubicin is superior to PVI in terms of reduction of systemic drug exposure and systemic toxicity.
我们使用一种新型肝静脉隔离和活性炭血液灌注(HVI-CHP)系统,评估了肝动脉灌注(HAI)和门静脉灌注(PVI)后阿霉素的区域药代动力学。HVI-CHP系统用于直接测定肝静脉中阿霉素的血浆浓度和肝静脉血流速度,同时消除药物的肝内再循环。比格犬通过肝动脉(HAI组,n = 6)或门静脉(PVI组,n = 6)接受阿霉素(1 mg/kg)。在两组中,肝静脉血均被完全隔离并导向CHP过滤器。过滤后的血液通过左颈静脉回流。在HVI-CHP过程中,监测肝静脉血流速度,并在过滤器前(=肝静脉)、过滤器后和全身血液中连续测量血浆阿霉素浓度。根据肝静脉中的血流速度和阿霉素水平确定阿霉素的肝组织摄取量。阿霉素的肝提取率定义为肝组织摄取量占给药量的百分比。在药物输注期间,两组情况相似,与过滤器前水平相比,HVI-CHP使过滤器后阿霉素水平降低了66-87%。HAI组过滤器前药物水平显著低于PVI组(P < 0.01)。因此,HAI组过滤器前药物水平的时间浓度曲线下面积(6.90±0.96微克·分钟/毫升)显著低于PVI组(18.10±2.90微克·分钟/毫升,P < 0.01)。相反,HAI组的肝提取率(84.6±2.9%)显著高于PVI组(58.1±3.4%,P < 0.01)。我们得出结论,在比格犬中,阿霉素经肝动脉给药时比经门静脉给药时更有效地被肝脏提取。这些结果表明,就减少全身药物暴露和全身毒性而言,阿霉素的HAI优于PVI。