Suppr超能文献

对因橄榄花粉致敏而患有变应性鼻结膜炎和轻度哮喘的儿科患者,采用标准化橄榄花粉提取物进行舌下免疫疗法的双盲、安慰剂对照评估。

Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized olive pollen extract in pediatric patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and mild asthma due to olive pollen sensitization.

作者信息

Vourdas D, Syrigou E, Potamianou P, Carat F, Batard T, André C, Papageorgiou P S

机构信息

P. & A. Kyriakou Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Allergy. 1998 Jul;53(7):662-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03952.x.

Abstract

For evaluation of the efficacy and the safety of specific sublingual immunotherapy with high allergen dose, 66 children with seasonal asthma, rhinitis, and conjunctivitis due to sensitization to olive pollen were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study between October 1994 and October 1996 in Greece. Thirty-four patients were randomly allocated to the active group, and 32 received placebo. Immunotherapy consisted of olive-allergen extracts (Stallergènes SA) administered sublingually pre- and coseasonally from January to July for 2 consecutive years. Serial concentrations from 1 to 300 IR. were used up to the maintenance dose of 20 drops of 300 IR daily. The cumulative dose for each patient was 300 times higher than in parenteral immunotherapy, and the cumulative dose of the major allergen Ole e 1 was 8.1 mg/2 years. The patients were assessed by clinical parameters (symptom and medication scores from patients' daily diaries) and immunologic measurements (specific IgE, IgG4, eosinophil cationic protein [ECP]) were performed. The actively treated patients had a significantly lower score for dyspnea (P<0.04 during the first season; P<0.03 during the second season). At the pollinic peak during the second year, a lower score of conjunctivitis was recorded (P<0.05) in the actively treated patients. The analysis of intragroup evolution showed that the total score of rhinitis increased significantly during the pollinic peak in the group under placebo, whereas there was no symptomatic peak for the same period in the group under active treatment. However, the difference between the groups was not significant. The medication score did not differ significantly between the groups. Oral steroids were the only variables with a P value near the significance level (P=0.06) in favor of the actively treated group. A significant decrease in skin reactivity was recorded in the active group after 2 years of treatment. No significant variation in specific IgE and IgG4 was detected. A significantly lower level of serum ECP was observed at the pollinic peak in the actively treated patients during the first pollen season (P=0.01), but this was not confirmed the second year when the ECP levels doubled in both groups without correlation to the clinical findings. Tolerance was excellent with only a few minor side-effects reported. In conclusion, high-dose specific sublingual immunotherapy appears to be safe and effective in improving mild seasonal asthma and conjunctivitis linked to olive-pollen sensitization.

摘要

为评估高变应原剂量特异性舌下免疫疗法的疗效和安全性,1994年10月至1996年10月在希腊开展了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究,纳入了66例因对橄榄花粉致敏而患有季节性哮喘、鼻炎和结膜炎的儿童。34例患者被随机分配至活性治疗组,32例接受安慰剂。免疫疗法包括舌下给予橄榄变应原提取物(Stallergènes SA),在1月至7月的花粉季前和花粉季期间连续2年给药。从1至300 IR的系列浓度用于直至每日20滴300 IR的维持剂量。每位患者的累积剂量比皮下免疫疗法高300倍,主要变应原Ole e 1的累积剂量为8.1 mg/2年。通过临床参数(患者每日日记中的症状和用药评分)对患者进行评估,并进行免疫测定(特异性IgE、IgG4、嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白[ECP])。活性治疗组患者的呼吸困难评分显著更低(第一个花粉季P<0.04;第二个花粉季P<0.03)。在第二年的花粉高峰时,活性治疗组患者的结膜炎评分更低(P<0.05)。组内演变分析显示,安慰剂组在花粉高峰期间鼻炎总分显著增加,而活性治疗组在同一时期无症状高峰。然而,两组之间的差异不显著。两组之间的用药评分无显著差异。口服类固醇是唯一P值接近显著性水平(P=0.06)且有利于活性治疗组的变量。治疗2年后,活性治疗组的皮肤反应性显著降低。未检测到特异性IgE和IgG4有显著变化。在第一个花粉季的花粉高峰时,活性治疗组患者的血清ECP水平显著更低(P=0.01),但第二年未得到证实,此时两组的ECP水平均翻倍,且与临床结果无关。耐受性良好,仅报告了少数轻微副作用。总之,高剂量特异性舌下免疫疗法在改善与橄榄花粉致敏相关的轻度季节性哮喘和结膜炎方面似乎是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验