Keeton P I, Schlindwein F S
Department of Engineering, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Eur J Ultrasound. 1998 Aug;7(3):209-18. doi: 10.1016/s0929-8266(98)00032-9.
This paper investigates the behaviour of the spectral broadening index (SBI) derived from spectra obtained using autoregressive (AR) modelling compared to that of SBI based on fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis of clinical Doppler ultrasound scans.
Doppler signals from internal carotid arteries of patients with normal and diseased vessels with up to 80% stenosis were analysed. A threshold at -6 dB of the maximum magnitude component of each individual spectrum was implemented to reject low-level noise. The SBI was obtained using the maximum and the mean frequency envelopes extracted from the sonogram.
A qualitative improvement in both the appearance of the AR sonograms and the shape of the individual AR spectra was noticeable. The AR approach consistently produced narrower spectra than the FFT and the shapes of the frequency envelopes derived from the AR sonogram and the FFT sonogram were also rather different. Despite these differences a strong correlation was observed between the value of the FFT-based SBI and the AR-based SBI. The mean value of the FFT-SBI is larger than that of the AR-SBI and the variance of the FFT-SBI is smaller than that of the AR-SBI based on a set of at least 20 sequentially recorded heartbeats.
It was established that, for all cases where significant stenosis was present, a statistically significant value for SBI could be obtained using four or more heartbeats if five spectra around the peak systole were used to estimate the SBI of each individual heartbeat. No quantitative advantage in using the AR approach over the FFT for the determination of SBI was obtained due to the poorer variance of the AR-SBI and the additional computational complexity of the AR approach.
本文研究了通过自回归(AR)建模从光谱中得出的光谱展宽指数(SBI)的行为,并将其与基于临床多普勒超声扫描的快速傅里叶变换(FFT)分析得出的SBI的行为进行比较。
分析了血管正常和病变(狭窄程度高达80%)患者颈内动脉的多普勒信号。对每个单独频谱的最大幅度分量在-6 dB处设置一个阈值,以去除低水平噪声。使用从超声图中提取的最大频率包络和平均频率包络来获得SBI。
AR超声图的外观和单个AR频谱的形状都有明显的定性改善。AR方法产生的频谱始终比FFT方法产生的频谱更窄,并且从AR超声图和FFT超声图得出的频率包络形状也有较大差异。尽管存在这些差异,但基于FFT的SBI值与基于AR的SBI值之间仍观察到强相关性。基于至少20个连续记录心跳的一组数据,FFT-SBI的平均值大于AR-SBI的平均值,且FFT-SBI的方差小于AR-SBI的方差。
已确定,对于所有存在明显狭窄的病例,如果使用收缩期峰值周围的五个频谱来估计每个心跳的SBI,那么使用四个或更多心跳即可获得具有统计学意义的SBI值。由于AR-SBI的方差较差以及AR方法的额外计算复杂性,在使用AR方法而非FFT方法来确定SBI方面未获得定量优势。