• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜脾切除术治疗血液系统疾病所致脾肿大的优势。

Advantages of laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly due to hematologic diseases.

作者信息

Yuan R H, Chen S B, Lee W J, Yu S C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei. Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 1998 Jul;97(7):485-9.

PMID:9700246
Abstract

Recent advancements in laparoscopic surgery have made laparoscopic splenectomy possible. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) or beta-thalassemia. From July 1993 to July 1997, 52 patients (ITP, 43 cases; beta-thalassemia, 9 cases) underwent either laparoscopic (30 patients, 9 men, 21 women; average age, 36.9 years) or conventional open splenectomy (22 patients, 5 men, 17 women; average age, 34.3 years). The two groups were similar in terms of sex, age, diagnosis, duration of disease, preoperative platelet count, and spleen size. The mean surgical time, estimated amount of blood loss, duration of postoperative recovery, analgesic usage, and complications were compared between the two groups. Laparoscopic splenectomy was successful in 29 (97%) of the 30 patients. The mean surgical time in the laparoscopy group was longer than in the open splenectomy group (190.6 vs 113.9 minutes, p < 0.01). The laparoscopy group had earlier postoperative oral intake (15.2 vs 52.6 hours, p < 0.01), less usage of analgesics (meperidine 50 mg/unit, 1.1 vs 2.8 units, p < 0.01) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.1 vs 6.8 days, p < 0.01). The estimated blood loss, incidence of accessory spleen, surgical complication rate, and recurrence rate of thrombocytopenia were similar in the two groups. Our findings show that laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with ITP or beta-thalassemia is as safe as the open approach. While laparoscopy required a longer surgical time, the recovery period was shorter, analgesic use was less, and physical discomfort was less severe.

摘要

腹腔镜手术的最新进展使得腹腔镜脾切除术成为可能。我们回顾性比较了特发性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)或β地中海贫血患者行腹腔镜脾切除术与开放性脾切除术的结果。1993年7月至1997年7月,52例患者(ITP 43例;β地中海贫血9例)接受了腹腔镜手术(30例患者,9例男性,21例女性;平均年龄36.9岁)或传统开放性脾切除术(22例患者,5例男性,17例女性;平均年龄34.3岁)。两组在性别、年龄、诊断、病程、术前血小板计数和脾脏大小方面相似。比较了两组的平均手术时间、估计失血量、术后恢复时间、镇痛药物使用情况及并发症。30例患者中有29例(97%)腹腔镜脾切除术成功。腹腔镜组的平均手术时间比开放性脾切除术组长(190.6分钟对113.9分钟,p<0.01)。腹腔镜组术后更早恢复经口进食(15.2小时对52.6小时,p<0.01),镇痛药物使用更少(哌替啶50mg/单位,1.1单位对2.8单位,p<0.01),术后住院时间更短(4.1天对6.8天,p<0.01)。两组的估计失血量、副脾发生率、手术并发症发生率和血小板减少症复发率相似。我们的研究结果表明,ITP或β地中海贫血患者行腹腔镜脾切除术与开放性手术一样安全。虽然腹腔镜手术需要更长的手术时间,但恢复期更短,镇痛药物使用更少,身体不适也更轻。

相似文献

1
Advantages of laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly due to hematologic diseases.腹腔镜脾切除术治疗血液系统疾病所致脾肿大的优势。
J Formos Med Assoc. 1998 Jul;97(7):485-9.
2
Outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy based on hematologic indication.基于血液学指征的腹腔镜脾切除术的结果
Surg Endosc. 2002 Feb;16(2):272-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8150-6. Epub 2001 Nov 12.
3
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy: review of 14 adult cases using the lateral approach.腹腔镜脾切除术的疗效与安全性:14例成人病例经外侧入路的回顾
Bol Asoc Med P R. 2009 Apr-Jun;101(2):43-9.
4
[Introduction of laparoscopic splenectomy for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura].[腹腔镜脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜的介绍]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Apr;129(2):108-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-818730.
5
Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and effective procedure for patients with splenomegaly due to portal hypertension.对于因门静脉高压导致脾肿大的患者,腹腔镜脾切除术是一种安全有效的手术方法。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15(3):304-9. doi: 10.1007/s00534-007-1232-7. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
6
Laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.腹腔镜脾切除术治疗特发性血小板减少性紫癜
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Dec;12(6):412-9. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200212000-00005.
7
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study.腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术治疗巨脾症的比较研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Jun;16(3):241-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.241.
8
Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly: a comparative study with conventional laparoscopic splenectomy.手辅助腹腔镜脾切除术治疗脾肿大:与传统腹腔镜脾切除术的比较研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Jan 5;120(1):41-5.
9
Laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with normal-sized spleens versus splenomegaly: does size matter?正常大小脾脏患者与脾肿大患者的腹腔镜脾切除术:脾脏大小有影响吗?
Am Surg. 2001 Sep;67(9):854-7; discussion 857-8.
10
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: the impact of spleen size on outcomes.腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术:脾脏大小对手术结果的影响。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Sep;23(9):760-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0012. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).腹腔镜脾切除术:欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)临床实践指南
Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):821-48. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9735-5. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
2
Laparoscopic splenectomy: the latest technical evaluation.腹腔镜脾切除术:最新技术评估
World J Gastroenterol. 2003 May;9(5):1086-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i5.1086.