Saouaf R, Arora S, Smakowski P, Caballero A E, Veves A
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass., USA.
Acad Radiol. 1998 Aug;5(8):556-60. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(98)80207-9.
The authors compared the postocclusion hyperemic responses of the brachial artery after occluding blood flow proximal to and distal to the studied area.
Response of the brachial artery to hypoxia was evaluated with duplex Doppler ultrasound in 13 healthy subjects. A pneumatic tourniquet was first positioned 2-5 cm superior to the left elbow, proximal to the area of artery studied. Two hours later the response was remeasured with the tourniquet positioned 2-5 cm inferior to the elbow, distal to the artery studied. Arterial diameter, mean and peak flow velocities, and heart rate were assessed.
No significant differences were observed between measurements of baseline and postischemic arterial diameter, percentage diameter change, baseline mean arterial blood flow velocity, baseline peak arterial blood flow velocity, or postischemic heart rate obtained with proximal occlusion of the artery and those obtained with distal occlusion. In contrast, mean and peak postischemic arterial blood flow velocity and preocclusion heart rate were higher in measurements made during proximal artery occlusion. Significant correlation was found between measurements of percentage change in artery diameter obtained with proximal artery occlusion and those obtained with distal occlusion (r = 0.611, P < .05).
There are no major differences in postischemic changes in brachial artery diameter related to reactive hyperemia between blood flow occlusion applied proximal and distal to the studied area. However, there are significant differences in the mean and peak systolic velocities. Either occlusion site can be used for clinical studies if arterial diameter change is monitored, but if velocity measurements are being compared, a single occlusion site should be chosen.
作者比较了在研究区域近端和远端阻断血流后肱动脉的闭塞后充血反应。
采用双功多普勒超声评估13名健康受试者肱动脉对缺氧的反应。首先将充气止血带置于左肘上方2 - 5厘米处,即所研究动脉区域的近端。两小时后,将止血带置于肘部下方2 - 5厘米处,即所研究动脉的远端,再次测量反应。评估动脉直径、平均流速和峰值流速以及心率。
在动脉近端闭塞和远端闭塞时测得的基线和缺血后动脉直径、直径变化百分比、基线平均动脉血流速度、基线峰值动脉血流速度或缺血后心率之间未观察到显著差异。相比之下,在近端动脉闭塞时测得的缺血后平均和峰值动脉血流速度以及闭塞前心率更高。在近端动脉闭塞和远端闭塞时测得的动脉直径变化百分比之间发现显著相关性(r = 0.611,P <.05)。
在所研究区域近端和远端应用血流阻断时,与反应性充血相关的肱动脉直径缺血后变化没有重大差异。然而,平均和峰值收缩期速度存在显著差异。如果监测动脉直径变化,两个闭塞部位均可用于临床研究,但如果比较速度测量值,则应选择单一闭塞部位。