Suppr超能文献

萘普生缓释片与普通片在健康志愿者中的单剂量和多剂量药代动力学比较。

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic comparison of a sustained-release tablet and conventional tablets of naproxen in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Zhou D, Zhang Q, Lu W, Xia Q, Wei S

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Beijing Medical University, Republic of China.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Jul;38(7):625-9. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04469.x.

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of a new sustained-release tablet of naproxen (500 mg once daily) were compared with a conventional tablet (250 mg twice daily) after single- or multiple-dose oral administration in healthy volunteers using an open, randomized two-way crossover experimental design. Naproxen was well absorbed from the sustained-release tablet (approximately 97%) compared with the conventional tablet. Pharmacokinetic data showed that the sustained-release formulation reached significantly delayed mean peak plasma levels (Cmax) in both single- and multiple-dose studies and lower Cmax in a single-dose study than the conventional formulation. However, there were no statistically significant differences in other pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), elimination half-life (t1/2), and elimination rate constant (Ke), in either single- or multiple-dose studies between the two treatments. In addition, there were no significant differences between formulations in Cmax, minimum plasma concentration (Cmin), and fluctuation index in the multiple-dose study.

摘要

在健康志愿者中,采用开放、随机双向交叉实验设计,比较了萘普生新型缓释片(每日一次,500毫克)和常规片(每日两次,250毫克)单剂量或多剂量口服给药后的药代动力学。与常规片相比,萘普生从缓释片中的吸收良好(约97%)。药代动力学数据表明,在单剂量和多剂量研究中,缓释制剂的平均血浆峰浓度(Cmax)显著延迟,且在单剂量研究中Cmax低于常规制剂。然而,在单剂量或多剂量研究中,两种治疗之间的其他药代动力学参数,包括浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)、消除半衰期(t1/2)和消除速率常数(Ke),均无统计学显著差异。此外,在多剂量研究中,两种制剂在Cmax、最低血浆浓度(Cmin)和波动指数方面也无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验