Violani C, Testa P, Casagrande M
Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Italy.
Sleep. 1998 Aug 1;21(5):472-6.
Much evidence indicates that during sleep there is a repatterning of motor asymmetries with a relative advantage of the left hand (i.e., the left hand moves more than the right). This could be due to the ability of the right hemisphere in operating at levels of reduced arousal (arousal hypothesis) or to its superior spatial abilities (motor specificity hypothesis), or it could indicate a greater need for sleep in the left hemisphere (homeostatic hypothesis). Since only the latter hypothesis predicts that the repatterning should be present in the first part of sleep (i.e., when the homeostatic processes are more pronounced), the present study evaluated whether actigraphic data are consistent with this prediction. Sixteen right-handed college students wore actigraphs (AMI 16K) on both upper and lower limbs for about 56 hours. Factorial ANOVAS were carried out on side (left vs right) and part (first vs second) of the recording period during sleep and waking. During waking, the right hand showed more intense motor activity as compared to the left. During sleep, in the first part of the night, the right hand lost this advantage, while in the second part of the night it regained its superiority. Since this repatterning was specific for hand movements and no difference was found in overall motor activity and in arousal between the two parts of the sleep period, the results are interpreted as consistent with the homeostatic hypothesis.
许多证据表明,睡眠期间运动不对称性会重新分布,左手具有相对优势(即左手比右手活动更多)。这可能是由于右半球在较低唤醒水平下运作的能力(唤醒假说),或者是其优越的空间能力(运动特异性假说),又或者这表明左半球对睡眠有更大需求(稳态假说)。由于只有后一种假说预测这种重新分布应出现在睡眠的第一阶段(即当稳态过程更为明显时),本研究评估了活动记录仪数据是否与这一预测相符。16名右利手大学生在上肢和下肢佩戴活动记录仪(AMI 16K)约56小时。对睡眠和清醒期间记录时段的侧别(左对右)和阶段(第一阶段对第二阶段)进行析因方差分析。清醒时,右手比左手表现出更强烈的运动活动。睡眠期间,在夜间的第一阶段,右手失去了这一优势,而在夜间的第二阶段又重新获得了优势。由于这种重新分布是手部运动特有的,且在睡眠时段的两个阶段之间,整体运动活动和唤醒水平均未发现差异,因此研究结果被解释为与稳态假说相符。