Kimura T, Wada H, Yoshida M, Kobayashi T, Kawabe A, Isogaki J, Ban S, Kazui T
First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Japan.
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Aug;8(4):300-3.
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LH) requires similar scar size to traditional open repair. To perform LH with minimal access, finer instruments were used. A 5-mm laparoscope was inserted from the umbilicus, and surgical instruments were inserted through 5- and 3-mm trocars to perform LH by the transabdominal preperitoneal approach. Polyester mesh was placed over the hernia orifice and the peritoneum was closed with 3-0 silk sutures. Sixteen patients underwent smaller access LH and 24 had standard LH. Although smaller access LH took longer (105.7 versus 83.9 min), significantly fewer patients required analgesia after smaller access LH than after standard LH (12.5 versus 70.8%), and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (4.6 versus 5.6 days). In addition, a better cosmetic outcome was obtained with smaller access LH. In conclusion, access was minimized by using fine-caliber instruments and polyester mesh, making LH less invasive and improving the cosmetic outcome.
腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LH)所需的瘢痕大小与传统开放修补术相似。为了以最小的切口进行LH,使用了更精细的器械。通过脐部插入一个5毫米的腹腔镜,并通过5毫米和3毫米的套管针插入手术器械,采用经腹腹膜前途径进行LH。将聚酯补片放置在疝孔上方,并用3-0丝线缝合关闭腹膜。16例患者接受了小切口LH,24例接受了标准LH。虽然小切口LH所需时间更长(105.7分钟对83.9分钟),但与标准LH相比,小切口LH后需要镇痛的患者明显更少(12.5%对70.8%),术后住院时间也更短(4.6天对5.6天)。此外,小切口LH的美容效果更好。总之,通过使用细口径器械和聚酯补片使切口最小化,使LH的侵入性更小,并改善了美容效果。