Mongan P D, Brown R S, Thwaites B K
Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.
Anesth Analg. 1998 Aug;87(2):258-65. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199808000-00005.
We evaluated the blood conservation effects of tranexamic acid (TA) or aprotinin administered before and during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of 150 adult patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Patients received either TA (2 g) or large-dose aprotinin (7 million KIU). Thirty additional untreated patients otherwise managed in a similar fashion were included from a recently completed study for comparison of outcomes. Demographic, medical, surgical, laboratory, mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTD), transfusion, and outcome data were collected. Allogeneic blood product administration was tightly controlled. The demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics did not significantly differ between the two therapy groups. The median postoperative MCTD loss in the TA group did not significantly differ from that in the aprotinin-treated group (708 vs 600 mL). The percentage of patients that received no allogeneic blood products was 25% for the TA group and 27% for the aprotinin group (P = not significant). The median number of allogeneic blood products administered to the TA group (0 U) did not significantly differ from that administered to the aprotinin group (0 U). The percentage of patients with excessive MCTD (>1000 mL/24 h) did not significantly differ between groups (19% and 17%, respectively). In comparison, the control group had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) median MCTD (1020 mL), median allogeneic blood product exposure (4.5 U), and incidence of excessive MCTD (66%) and transfusion therapy (66%). These data help to support the use of pharmacologic methods to improve clinically relevant indicators of blood conservation for primary CPB procedures. Furthermore, the data show that TA is equivalent to aprotinin for blood conservation in patients at risk of excessive post-CPB bleeding and transfusion therapy.
In a randomized, blind trial, we evaluated the effects of tranexamic acid or aprotinin on blood conservation after primary cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Both drugs were equally effective in reducing blood loss, the incidence of transfusion, and the amount of blood products transfused compared with placebon.
在一项针对150例接受初次冠状动脉搭桥手术的成年患者的前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中,我们评估了在体外循环(CPB)前及CPB期间给予氨甲环酸(TA)或抑肽酶的血液保护效果。患者接受TA(2 g)或大剂量抑肽酶(700万KIU)治疗。另外从近期完成的一项研究中纳入30例未接受治疗但其他方面治疗方式相似的患者以比较结果。收集了人口统计学、医学、手术、实验室、纵隔胸管引流量(MCTD)、输血及结果数据。严格控制异体血制品的输注。两个治疗组的人口统计学、医学和手术特征无显著差异。TA组术后MCTD损失中位数与抑肽酶治疗组无显著差异(708 vs 600 mL)。未接受异体血制品的患者比例,TA组为25%,抑肽酶组为27%(P = 无显著性差异)。TA组输注异体血制品的中位数(0 U)与抑肽酶组(0 U)无显著差异。MCTD过多(>1000 mL/24 h)的患者比例在两组间无显著差异(分别为19%和17%)。相比之下,对照组的MCTD中位数(1020 mL)、异体血制品暴露中位数(4.5 U)、MCTD过多发生率(66%)及输血治疗率(66%)显著更高(P < 0.05)。这些数据有助于支持使用药理学方法来改善初次CPB手术中与血液保护相关的临床指标。此外,数据表明,对于有CPB术后出血过多和输血治疗风险的患者,TA在血液保护方面等同于抑肽酶。
在一项随机、盲法试验中,我们评估了氨甲环酸或抑肽酶对初次体外循环手术后血液保护的效果。与安慰剂相比,两种药物在减少失血、输血发生率和输血量方面同样有效。