Berkowitz S D, Sane D C, Sigmon K N, Shavender J H, Harrington R A, Tcheng J E, Topol E J, Califf R M
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Aug;32(2):311-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00252-6.
This study sought to determine the frequency of thrombocytopenia and its relation with clinical outcomes in high risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization who received either the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab (ReoPro, c7E3 Fab) or conventional therapy.
The development of thrombocytopenia on exposure to GPIIb/IIIa antagonists threatens the utility and economic viability of this drug class for patients with vascular disease.
We analyzed data from the Evaluation of c7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications trial (EPIC), a 2,099-patient, randomized trial of placebo, abciximab bolus or abciximab bolus plus a 12-h infusion during high-risk coronary revascularization.
Thrombocytopenia (nadir platelet count <100 x 10(9)/ liter) developed in 81 patients (3.9%) during their hospital stay, with 19 (0.9%) developing severe (<50 x 10(9)/liter) thrombocytopenia. Both thrombocytopenia and severe thrombocytopenia were more frequent in the bolus-plus-infusion arm (5.2% and 1.6%, respectively) than in the bolus-only and placebo arms combined (p = 0.020 and p = 0.025, respectively). Acute profound thrombocytopenia developed in two patients in the bolus-plus-infusion arm. Patients with thrombocytopenia experienced more unfavorable clinical outcomes than those who did not develop thrombocytopenia, regardless of treatment assignment, but those with thrombocytopenia who received abciximab had fewer worse outcomes at 30 days. Multivariable logistic modeling revealed a lower baseline platelet count, older age and lighter weight to be important predictors of thrombocytopenia. In a logistic regression model, bolus-plus-infusion treatment was a significant predictor of thrombocytopenia (p = 0.016) and remained so after adjustment for procedures and baseline risk factors (p = 0.0077).
Thrombocytopenia was associated with adverse clinical outcomes and excessive bleeding, but patients receiving abciximab fared better than those receiving placebo.
本研究旨在确定接受血小板糖蛋白(GP)IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂阿昔单抗(ReoPro,c7E3 Fab)或传统治疗的高危经皮冠状动脉血运重建患者中血小板减少症的发生率及其与临床结局的关系。
接触GPIIb/IIIa拮抗剂后发生血小板减少症,威胁到该类药物对血管疾病患者的效用和经济可行性。
我们分析了c7E3预防缺血性并发症试验(EPIC)的数据,这是一项纳入2099例患者的随机试验,在高危冠状动脉血运重建期间给予安慰剂、阿昔单抗推注或阿昔单抗推注加12小时输注。
81例患者(3.9%)在住院期间发生血小板减少症(最低点血小板计数<100×10⁹/升),其中19例(0.9%)发生严重血小板减少症(<50×10⁹/升)。推注加输注组血小板减少症和严重血小板减少症的发生率均高于仅推注组和安慰剂组之和(分别为5.2%和1.6%,p分别为0.020和0.025)。推注加输注组有2例患者发生急性严重血小板减少症。无论治疗分配如何,血小板减少症患者比未发生血小板减少症的患者经历更多不良临床结局,但接受阿昔单抗治疗的血小板减少症患者在30天时不良结局较少。多变量逻辑模型显示,较低的基线血小板计数、老年和较轻的体重是血小板减少症的重要预测因素。在逻辑回归模型中,推注加输注治疗是血小板减少症的显著预测因素(p = 0.016),在调整手术和基线风险因素后仍然如此(p = 0.0077)。
血小板减少症与不良临床结局和过度出血相关,但接受阿昔单抗治疗的患者比接受安慰剂治疗的患者情况更好。