Tang H, Hammond P, Brimijoin S
Department of Pharmacology, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Foundation, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.
Exp Neurol. 1998 Aug;152(2):167-76. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1998.6822.
Rats given antibodies against acetylcholinesterase (AChE) develop sympathetic dysfunction stemming from losses of preganglionic neurons in spinal cord. Central effects of AChE antibodies are surprising since IgG does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, and lesions of peripheral terminals should not cause cell death. This study was designed to explore the distribution of central neural damage and to investigate features that might account for vulnerability. Rat spinal cord and brainstem were stained for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) immunoreactivity. Four months after administration of AChE antibodies, ChAT-positive neurons in the intermediolateral nucleus (IML) were 61-66% fewer throughout the thoracolumbar cord (T1, T2, T8, T12, L1). NOS-positive neurons in these loci were affected to the same extent by antibody-treatment, although they were only two-thirds as numerous. By contrast, neurons in the central autonomic nucleus of the thoracolumbar cord were scarcely affected. These results point to immunochemical differences in the central autonomic outflow, which may partially explain the puzzling selectivity of neural damage in AChE immunolesioning. Different results were obtained after guanethidine sympathectomy, which ablated nearly all neurons in the superior cervical ganglion without any effect on preganglionic neurons in the IML. Therefore, if the central effects of antibodies are indirectly mediated by loss of trophic support from the periphery, this support cannot arise from adrenergic neurons but must come from other ganglionic cells.
给予抗乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)抗体的大鼠会出现交感神经功能障碍,这源于脊髓节前神经元的损失。AChE抗体的中枢效应令人惊讶,因为IgG不易穿过血脑屏障,且外周终末的损伤不应导致细胞死亡。本研究旨在探索中枢神经损伤的分布,并研究可能解释易损性的特征。对大鼠脊髓和脑干进行胆碱乙酰转移酶(ChAT)和一氧化氮合酶(NOS)免疫反应性染色。给予AChE抗体四个月后,胸腰段脊髓(T1、T2、T8、T12、L1)中间外侧核(IML)中ChAT阳性神经元减少了61%-66%。这些位点的NOS阳性神经元受抗体治疗的影响程度相同,尽管其数量仅为ChAT阳性神经元的三分之二。相比之下,胸腰段脊髓中枢自主神经核中的神经元几乎未受影响。这些结果表明中枢自主神经传出存在免疫化学差异,这可能部分解释了AChE免疫损伤中神经损伤令人困惑的选择性。胍乙啶交感神经切除术后得到了不同的结果,该手术几乎消除了颈上神经节中的所有神经元,而对IML中的节前神经元没有任何影响。因此,如果抗体的中枢效应是由外周营养支持的丧失间接介导的,那么这种支持不可能来自肾上腺素能神经元,而必须来自其他神经节细胞。