Khder Y, Bray des Boscs L, el Ghawi R, Meilhac B, Montestruc F, Stoltz J F, Zannad F
Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC), INSERM-CHU, Nancy, France.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1998;12(4):457-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1998.tb00972.x.
In addition to their effects on blood pressure, antihypertensive agents may produce additional effects on blood rheology and arterial compliance abnormalities which may play a role in target-organ damage. However, these effects may depend only on the specific pharmacological properties of certain antihypertensive agents, and may be partly unrelated to blood pressure lowering action. We compared the effects of nitrendipine 20 mg once daily to hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily in 33 mildly to moderately hypertensive and otherwise healthy patients, in a double blind parallel group trial. Blood rheology (blood fibrinogen and protein concentrations, hematocrit, plasma viscosity and whole blood viscosity at shear rates 0.2 to 128 s-1, erythrocyte deformability and aggregation) and radial artery diameter and compliance (Nius I + Finapres) were measured at baseline and after 2 months of treatment. Both drugs produced similar blood pressure lowering. Blood viscosity increased for all shear rates in the hydrochlorothiazide group and decreased in the nitrendipine treated group. Erythrocyte deformability increased in the nitrendipine but not in the thiazide group. Radial artery diameter and compliance were not different between the two groups but there was a trend towards an increase in cross-sectional compliance in the hydrochlorothiazide group and towards a decrease in the nitrendipine group. Our data show that, in mildly hypertensive patients, blood pressure control by nitrendipine produced more favourable effects on relevant rheological variables than hydrochlorothiazide. Radial artery compliance changes tended to be altered also in opposite directions by the two agents. The significance and the clinical relevance of these effects may require further investigations.
除了对血压的影响外,抗高血压药物可能还会对血液流变学和动脉顺应性异常产生额外作用,而这些异常可能在靶器官损害中起作用。然而,这些作用可能仅取决于某些抗高血压药物的特定药理特性,并且可能部分与降压作用无关。我们在一项双盲平行组试验中,比较了33例轻度至中度高血压且其他方面健康的患者每天服用一次20毫克尼群地平和每天服用一次25毫克氢氯噻嗪的效果。在基线和治疗2个月后,测量血液流变学指标(血纤维蛋白原和蛋白质浓度、血细胞比容、血浆粘度以及在剪切速率0.2至128 s-1时的全血粘度、红细胞变形性和聚集性)以及桡动脉直径和顺应性(Nius I + Finapres)。两种药物的降压效果相似。氢氯噻嗪组所有剪切速率下的血液粘度均升高,而尼群地平治疗组则降低。尼群地平组红细胞变形性增加,而噻嗪组未增加。两组之间桡动脉直径和顺应性无差异,但氢氯噻嗪组的横断面顺应性有增加趋势,尼群地平组有降低趋势。我们的数据表明,在轻度高血压患者中,尼群地平控制血压对相关血液流变学变量产生的影响比氢氯噻嗪更有利。两种药物对桡动脉顺应性的改变也倾向于相反的方向。这些作用的意义和临床相关性可能需要进一步研究。