Suppr超能文献

与从健康无关供体采集骨髓相比,外周血干细胞动员的可接受性和可行性。

Acceptance and feasibility of peripheral stem cell mobilisation compared to bone marrow collection from healthy unrelated donors.

作者信息

Ordemann R, Hölig K, Wagner K, Rautenberg U, Bornhäuser M, Kroschinsky F, Schäfer J, Schuler U, Ehninger G

机构信息

Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Jun;21 Suppl 3:S25-8.

PMID:9712488
Abstract

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation leads to an earlier engraftment compared to BMT. The feasibility, acceptance and long-term side-effects of G-CSF mobilisation of PBSC in unrelated healthy donors needs to be evaluated. Forty unrelated healthy donors received G-CSF in a dose of 10 microg/kg bodyweight for 5 days and two aphereses were performed. The donors were monitored prospectively. The data were compared to bone marrow harvests from unrelated donors. Almost all stem cell donors reported some side-effects due to Filgrastim application. Bone pain (32), headache (20), chest pain (two) and night sweats (one) were complained of. By taking analgesics, the pain was relieved in most cases. No donor discontinued the filgrastim application. Bone pain and headache resolved within 2-4 days after termination of Filgrastim application. There was, as expected, a seven-fold increase in the number of total WBCs. There were no significant changes of platelet counts during G-CSF application. After 4 weeks haemoglobin concentration and platelet counts showed no significant differences compared to baseline values. The aphereses were mostly tolerated very well. Eighteen donors reported paraesthesia, one donor developed dizziness, two complained of nausea and vomiting. There was a significant decrease in platelet count (242 before, 98 x 10(9)/l after aphereses). Autologous platelets were transfused after the second aphereses in four donors. These data were compared to data from 245 unrelated bone marrow donors, who had on average, 14 days bone pain and tiredness after donation. The G-CSF mobilisation and apheresis of peripheral blood stem cells is an alternative to traditional bone marrow harvesting in unrelated healthy donors. It is well tolerated and the duration of side-effects on average is shorter than after the surgical procedure. So far no long-term effects have been observed in the follow-up.

摘要

与骨髓移植相比,异基因外周血干细胞移植可使植入更早。需要评估在无关健康供体中使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员外周血干细胞的可行性、可接受性和长期副作用。40名无关健康供体接受了剂量为10微克/千克体重的G-CSF,持续5天,并进行了两次单采术。对供体进行前瞻性监测。将这些数据与来自无关供体的骨髓采集数据进行比较。几乎所有干细胞供体都报告了因应用非格司亭而出现的一些副作用。有骨痛(32例)、头痛(20例)、胸痛(2例)和盗汗(1例)的主诉。通过服用镇痛药,大多数情况下疼痛得到缓解。没有供体停止应用非格司亭。骨痛和头痛在非格司亭应用终止后2至4天内消失。正如预期的那样,白细胞总数增加了7倍。在应用G-CSF期间血小板计数没有显著变化。4周后,血红蛋白浓度和血小板计数与基线值相比没有显著差异。单采术大多耐受性良好。18名供体报告有感觉异常,1名供体出现头晕,2名主诉恶心和呕吐。血小板计数有显著下降(单采术前为242,单采术后为98×10⁹/L)。4名供体在第二次单采术后输注了自体血小板。将这些数据与245名无关骨髓供体的数据进行比较,这些骨髓供体在捐献后平均有14天的骨痛和疲劳。在无关健康供体中,G-CSF动员和单采外周血干细胞是传统骨髓采集的一种替代方法。它耐受性良好,副作用的持续时间平均比手术操作后短。到目前为止,在随访中未观察到长期影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验