Stöger H, Samonigg H, Krainer M, Ploszczynski M, Nirnberger G, Maca S, Hehenwarter W, Wirth M, Schüller J, Vavra N, Scheithauer W, Kornek G, Stierer M, Zielinski C C
Department of Internal Medicine, Karl Franzens University, Graz, Austria.
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Mar;34(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10039-9.
A randomised phase II/III study was conducted in patients with advanced breast cancer to determine the dose intensity achievable through an acceleration of administration of chemotherapy with epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) alone, as compared with the combination of this regimen with two different schedules of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). 73 patients received EC intravenous (i.v.) (epidoxorubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) on day 1 (group A), or the same chemotherapy plus sub-cutaneous (s.c.) GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day) either from days 3 to 12 (group B) or from days -6 to -3 (group C). The primary objective of the study was the investigation of dose intensity delivered in the three treatment arms, whereas the secondary objective was response rate. A significant increase (P = 0.006) in dose intensity of 21% was observed for treatment group B, whereas the increase in dose intensity achieved in group C (7%) was not significant (P = 0.086). Response rates (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) of 56% were observed in group A, 65% in group B, and 57% in group C, respectively. This difference in response rates did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.271). We thus conclude that an acceleration of the EC regimen over the standard schedule could be accomplished with postchemotherapeutic GM-CSF support, leading to an increase in dose intensity, whereas pretherapeutic short-term GM-CSF administration did not reach this goal.
对晚期乳腺癌患者进行了一项随机II/III期研究,以确定与单独使用表柔比星和环磷酰胺(EC)化疗方案加两种不同疗程的粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)联合使用相比,仅通过加速EC化疗给药可实现的剂量强度。73例患者在第1天接受EC静脉注射(表柔比星100mg/m²,环磷酰胺600mg/m²)(A组),或相同化疗加皮下注射GM-CSF(5μg/kg/天),分别从第3天至第12天(B组)或从第-6天至第-3天(C组)。该研究的主要目的是调查三个治疗组的给药剂量强度,次要目的是缓解率。B治疗组的剂量强度显著增加(P = 0.006),增加了21%,而C组剂量强度增加了7%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.086)。A组、B组和C组的缓解率(完全缓解(CR)+部分缓解(PR))分别为56%、65%和57%。缓解率的差异未达到统计学意义(P = 0.271)。因此,我们得出结论,化疗后给予GM-CSF支持可加速EC方案超过标准疗程,导致剂量强度增加,而化疗前短期给予GM-CSF未达到这一目标。