Lewis G, Jonathan V, Kambhampati S
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Memphis, TN 38152, USA.
Biomed Mater Eng. 1998;8(1):11-23.
The present study sought to examine if, and to what extent, the representation of the elastic properties of material(s) in a model of an endoprosthesis per se or a construct that includes an endoprosthesis affects the stresses in the model, when the finite element analysis method is used to obtain these stresses. For this purpose, two models were examined. One was of an elastomeric metacarpophalangeal joint implant, with the material being assumed to have isotropic elastic properties in one case while it was represented as hyperelastic in the other. The model used in the second study case was that of a construct comprising the tibial component of a total knee replacement, the associated tibial insert, the resected bones, and the acrylic bone cement layer. In one analysis of this model, all the materials were taken to have isotropic elastic properties, while in the other analysis, the cortical bone was represented as transversely isotropic, with all other materials being considered to have isotropic elastic properties. The result show that, in both study cases considered, there is a strong effect of the representation of the elastic properties of material(s) on the stresses in the models.
本研究旨在探讨当使用有限元分析方法获取应力时,在假体模型本身或包含假体的结构中材料弹性特性的表示方式是否以及在多大程度上会影响模型中的应力。为此,研究了两个模型。一个是弹性体掌指关节植入物模型,在一种情况下假设材料具有各向同性弹性特性,而在另一种情况下将其表示为超弹性材料。第二个研究案例中使用的模型是一个包含全膝关节置换胫骨部件、相关胫骨衬垫、切除的骨头以及丙烯酸骨水泥层的结构。在对该模型的一次分析中,所有材料都被视为具有各向同性弹性特性,而在另一次分析中,皮质骨被表示为横观各向同性,其他所有材料则被认为具有各向同性弹性特性。结果表明,在所考虑的两个研究案例中,材料弹性特性的表示方式对模型中的应力都有很大影响。