Zatz M, Sumita D, Campiotto S, Canovas M, Cerqueira A, Vainzof M, Passos-Bueno M R
Departamento de Biologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Am J Med Genet. 1998 Jul 24;78(4):361-5. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19980724)78:4<361::aid-ajmg11>3.0.co;2-g.
Duchenne dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked lethal condition which affects 1 in 3,500 boys. The DMD gene is deleted in about 60-65% of patients while in the remaining 35-40% the condition is caused by point mutations, small insertions, or duplications. We have ascertained 967 DMD families (680 isolated and 287 familial cases). Screening for deletions showed a molecular deletion in 383 among 615 (62.3%) analyzed cases. However, 10 families were unusual: In 7 of them, 2 or more DMD patients were related through paternal lines while in 3 others, affected boys related through maternal lines carried different mutations or originated through independent new mutation events. The finding of 10 atypical genealogies, which represent about 1% of the sample (10/967) or about 3% of familial cases (10/287) is higher than we would expect by chance. Even so, it is an underestimate because screening of mutations in all the affected DMD relatives from each genealogy is not done in many of the familial cases. It suggests that other mechanisms (such as transposon-like elements, for example) could be responsible for a higher genomic instability leading to novel mutations as reported previously by us and others in DMD and in other genetic disorders such as hemophilia and inherited peripheral neuropathies. On the other hand, it shows the importance of testing all affected patients within each genealogy to prevent possible mistakes in carrier detection, genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis.
杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)是一种X连锁致死性疾病,每3500名男孩中就有1人受其影响。约60 - 65%的患者DMD基因发生缺失,其余35 - 40%的病例是由点突变、小插入或重复引起的。我们确定了967个DMD家系(680个散发病例和287个家族病例)。对缺失情况的筛查显示,在615例分析病例中有383例(62.3%)存在分子缺失。然而,有10个家系情况异常:其中7个家系中,2名或更多DMD患者通过父系相关;另外3个家系中,通过母系相关的患病男孩携带不同突变或源于独立的新突变事件。发现10个非典型家系,约占样本的1%(10/967)或家族病例的3%(10/287),高于我们偶然预期的比例。即便如此,这仍是一个低估数字,因为在许多家族病例中并未对每个家系中所有受影响的DMD亲属进行突变筛查。这表明其他机制(例如转座子样元件)可能导致更高的基因组不稳定性,从而产生新的突变,正如我们和其他人之前在DMD以及血友病和遗传性周围神经病等其他遗传疾病中所报道的那样。另一方面,这显示了对每个家系中的所有受影响患者进行检测对于防止携带者检测、遗传咨询和产前诊断中可能出现的错误的重要性。