Velders M P, van Rhijn C M, Oskam E, Fleuren G J, Warnaar S O, Litvinov S V
Department of Pathology, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Br J Cancer. 1998 Aug;78(4):478-83. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.518.
Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) is considered to be the major mechanism through which tumour cells, upon treatment with anti-tumour MAbs, are eliminated in vivo. However, the relative importance of various parameters that influence the efficacy of ADCC is unclear. Here we present in vitro data on the impact of MAb affinity and antigen density on ADCC, as obtained by comparison of two MAbs against the tumour-associated antigen Ep-CAM. The low-affinity MAb 17-1A (Ka = 5 x 10(7)M(-1)) currently used for therapy, and the high-affinity MAb 323/A3 (Ka = 2 x 10(9) M(-1)), were compared in ADCC experiments against murine and human tumour target cells transfected with the Ep-CAM cDNA under the control of an inducible promoter to enable regulation of the target antigen expression levels. Data obtained from these studies revealed that the high-affinity MAb, in contrast to the low-affinity MAb, could mediate killing of tumour cells with low antigen expression levels. Even at comparable MAb-binding levels, ADCC mediated by the high-affinity MAb was more effective. The kinetics of ADCC was also found to be determined by the level of antigen expression, and by the affinity and the concentration of the MAb used. The efficacy of ADCC with both low- and high-affinity MAbs further depended on adhesive interactions between effector and target cells mediated by CD18. However, at every given MAb concentration these interactions were of less importance for the high-affinity MAb than for the low-affinity MAb. As heterogeneity of a target antigen expression is a common feature of all tumours, and some tumour cells express very low levels of the antigen, the use of high-affinity MAbs in immunotherapy may significantly improve the clinical results obtained to the present date in the treatment of minimal residual disease.
抗体依赖的细胞毒性作用(ADCC)被认为是肿瘤细胞在用抗肿瘤单克隆抗体治疗后在体内被清除的主要机制。然而,影响ADCC疗效的各种参数的相对重要性尚不清楚。在此,我们通过比较两种针对肿瘤相关抗原Ep-CAM的单克隆抗体,给出了关于单克隆抗体亲和力和抗原密度对ADCC影响的体外数据。在诱导型启动子控制下,将目前用于治疗的低亲和力单克隆抗体17-1A(Ka = 5×10⁷M⁻¹)和高亲和力单克隆抗体323/A3(Ka = 2×10⁹M⁻¹),在ADCC实验中针对转染了Ep-CAM cDNA的鼠源和人源肿瘤靶细胞进行比较,以调节靶抗原表达水平。从这些研究中获得的数据显示,与低亲和力单克隆抗体相比,高亲和力单克隆抗体能够介导低抗原表达水平肿瘤细胞的杀伤。即使在相当的单克隆抗体结合水平下,高亲和力单克隆抗体介导的ADCC也更有效。还发现ADCC的动力学由抗原表达水平、所用单克隆抗体的亲和力和浓度决定。低亲和力和高亲和力单克隆抗体的ADCC疗效还进一步取决于由CD18介导的效应细胞与靶细胞之间的黏附相互作用。然而,在每个给定的单克隆抗体浓度下,这些相互作用对高亲和力单克隆抗体的重要性低于对低亲和力单克隆抗体的重要性。由于靶抗原表达的异质性是所有肿瘤的共同特征,并且一些肿瘤细胞表达非常低水平的抗原,在免疫治疗中使用高亲和力单克隆抗体可能会显著改善目前在治疗微小残留病方面所取得的临床结果。