Blood. 1998 Sep 1;92(5):1541-8.
Several prospective randomized studies have shown that the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) prolongs the survival by comparison with conventional chemotherapy. However, although IFN-alpha can induce cytogenetic responses, true complete remissions are rarely achieved and information on the long-term effects of IFN-alpha treatment is limited. For that purpose, we updated and analyzed a prospective comparative trial of IFN-alpha and conventional chemotherapy that was initiated in 1986. The first analysis of the trial was already published, and showed a survival advantage for IFN-alpha (N Engl J Med 12:820, 1994). The observation period of living patients now ranges between 95 and 129 months and we examined the long-term effects of IFN-alpha treatment, always by comparison with conventional chemotherapy and according to the intention-to-treat principle. The patients who were submitted to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in chronic phase (38 of 322 or 12%) were censored at the date of BMT. Seventy-three of the original 284 nontransplanted patients were alive, 56 (30%) in the IFN-alpha arm and 17 (18%) in the chemotherapy arm. Forty-one patients overall (14%) were still receiving IFN-alpha. In the IFN-alpha arm 9 patients were in continuous complete cytogenetic remission and 11 were in major or minor cytogenetic remission. Median and 10-year survival of low-risk patients were 104 months (95% CI, 85 to 127 months) and 47% (95% CI, 36% to 59%) in IFN-alpha arm versus 64 months (95% CI, 49 to 98 months) and 30% (95% CI, 16% to 44%) in chemotherapy arm (P = .03). Median and ten-year survival of non-low-risk patients were 69 months (95% CI, 56 to 76 months) and 16% (95% CI, 8% to 24%) in IFN-alpha arm versus 46 months (95% CI, 39 to 61 months) and 5% (95% CI, 0% to 11%) in chemotherapy arm (P = .006). A low Sokal's risk, hematologic response, and cytogenetic response were associated with a longer survival. No major or unusual side effects were recorded after the 5th year of IFN-alpha treatment. Fourteen patients died in chronic phase, 9 (4%) in IFN-alpha arm and 5 (5%) in chemotherapy arm, mainly of cardiovascular accidents (6 cases) and of other cancers (5 cases). We conclude that a policy of chronic treatment with IFN-alpha maintained a significant survival advantage over conventional chemotherapy on a long-term basis and irrespective of the risk. However, the great majority of the long-term survivors were in the low-risk group. The question of treatment discontinuation was not addressed in this study.
多项前瞻性随机研究表明,与传统化疗相比,使用α干扰素(IFN-α)治疗慢性髓性白血病可延长生存期。然而,尽管IFN-α可诱导细胞遗传学反应,但真正的完全缓解很少实现,且关于IFN-α治疗长期效果的信息有限。为此,我们更新并分析了一项始于1986年的IFN-α与传统化疗的前瞻性对照试验。该试验的首次分析已经发表,显示IFN-α具有生存优势(《新英格兰医学杂志》12:820, 1994)。目前存活患者的观察期在95至129个月之间,我们始终按照意向性治疗原则,通过与传统化疗对比,研究了IFN-α治疗的长期效果。处于慢性期接受异基因骨髓移植(BMT)的患者(322例中的38例或12%)在BMT日期被截尾。最初的284例未移植患者中有73例存活,IFN-α组56例(30%),化疗组17例(18%)。共有41例患者(14%)仍在接受IFN-α治疗。在IFN-α组,9例患者处于持续完全细胞遗传学缓解状态,11例处于主要或次要细胞遗传学缓解状态。低风险患者在IFN-α组的中位生存期和10年生存率分别为104个月(95%CI,85至127个月)和47%(95%CI,36%至59%),而在化疗组分别为64个月(95%CI,49至98个月)和30%(95%CI,16%至44%)(P = 0.03)。非低风险患者在IFN-α组的中位生存期和10年生存率分别为69个月(95%CI,56至76个月)和16%(95%CI,8%至24%),而在化疗组分别为46个月(95%CI,39至61个月)和5%(95%CI,0%至11%)(P = 0.006)。低Sokal风险、血液学反应和细胞遗传学反应与较长生存期相关。IFN-α治疗第5年后未记录到重大或异常副作用。14例患者死于慢性期,IFN-α组9例(4%),化疗组5例(5%),主要死于心血管意外(6例)和其他癌症(5例)。我们得出结论,长期采用IFN-α进行慢性治疗相对于传统化疗在生存方面具有显著优势,且与风险无关。然而,绝大多数长期存活者属于低风险组。本研究未涉及治疗中断的问题。