Larson R A, Dodge R K, Linker C A, Stone R M, Powell B L, Lee E J, Schulman P, Davey F R, Frankel S R, Bloomfield C D, George S L, Schiffer C A
University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637-1470, USA.
Blood. 1998 Sep 1;92(5):1556-64.
Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) shortens the time to neutrophil recovery after intensive chemotherapy, but its role in the treatment of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is uncertain. We randomly assigned 198 adults with untreated ALL (median age, 35 years; range, 16 to 83) to receive either placebo or G-CSF (5 microgram/kg/d) subcutaneously, beginning 4 days after starting intensive remission induction chemotherapy and continuing until the neutrophil count was >/=1, 000/microL for 2 days. The study assignment was unblinded as individual patients achieved a complete remission (CR). Patients initially assigned to G-CSF then continued to receive G-CSF through 2 monthly courses of consolidation therapy. Patients assigned to placebo received no further study drug. The median time to recover neutrophils >/=1,000/microL during the remission induction course was 16 days (interquartile range [IQR], 15 to 18 days) for the patients assigned to receive G-CSF and 22 days (IQR, 19 to 29 days) for the patients assigned to placebo (P < .001). Patients in the G-CSF group had significantly shorter durations of neutropenia (<1, 000/microL) and thrombocytopenia (<50,000/microL) and fewer days in the hospital (median, 22 days v 28 days; P = .02) compared with patients receiving placebo. The patients assigned to receive G-CSF had a higher CR rate and fewer deaths during remission induction than did those receiving placebo (P = .04 by the chi-square test for trend). During Courses IIA and IIB of consolidation treatment, patients in the G-CSF group had significantly more rapid recovery of neutrophils >/=1,000/microL than did the control group by approximately 6 to 9 days. However, the patients in the G-CSF group did not complete the planned first 3 months of chemotherapy any more rapidly than did the patients in the placebo group. Overall toxicity was not lessened by the use of G-CSF. After a median follow-up of 4. 7 years, there were no significant differences in either the disease-free survival (P = .53) or the overall survival (P = .25) for the patients assigned to G-CSF (medians, 2.3 years and 2.4 years, respectively) compared with those assigned to placebo (medians, 1.7 and 1.8 years, respectively). Adults who received intensive chemotherapy for ALL benefited from G-CSF treatment, but its use did not markedly affect the ultimate outcome.
重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF;非格司亭)可缩短强化化疗后中性粒细胞恢复的时间,但其在成人急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)治疗中的作用尚不确定。我们将198例未经治疗的ALL成人患者(中位年龄35岁;范围16至83岁)随机分组,从强化诱导缓解化疗开始4天后,皮下注射安慰剂或G-CSF(5微克/千克/天),持续至中性粒细胞计数≥1000/微升并持续2天。当个体患者达到完全缓解(CR)时,研究分组不再设盲。最初分配接受G-CSF的患者随后继续接受G-CSF进行2个疗程的巩固治疗。分配接受安慰剂的患者不再接受进一步的研究药物。在诱导缓解疗程中,分配接受G-CSF的患者中性粒细胞恢复至≥1000/微升的中位时间为16天(四分位间距[IQR],15至18天),而分配接受安慰剂的患者为22天(IQR,19至29天)(P<0.001)。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,G-CSF组患者的中性粒细胞减少(<1000/微升)和血小板减少(<50000/微升)持续时间显著缩短,住院天数也更少(中位值,22天对28天;P = 0.02)。分配接受G-CSF的患者在诱导缓解期间的CR率更高,死亡人数更少,与接受安慰剂的患者相比(趋势卡方检验P = 0.04)。在巩固治疗的IIA和IIB疗程中,G-CSF组患者中性粒细胞恢复至≥1000/微升的速度明显比对照组快约6至9天。然而,G-CSF组患者完成计划的前3个月化疗的速度并不比安慰剂组患者更快。使用G-CSF并未减轻总体毒性。中位随访4.7年后,与分配接受安慰剂的患者(中位值分别为1.7年和1.8年)相比,分配接受G-CSF的患者(中位值分别为2.3年和2.4年)在无病生存期(P = 0.53)或总生存期(P = 0.25)方面均无显著差异。接受ALL强化化疗的成人患者从G-CSF治疗中获益,但使用G-CSF并未显著影响最终结局。