Mutis T, Schrama E, Melief C J, Goulmy E
Department of Immunohematology and Blood Bank, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Blood. 1998 Sep 1;92(5):1677-84.
Despite sufficient levels of HLA class I and class II expression, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells usually fail to induce a significant T-cell response in vitro. Therefore, we investigated whether in vitro modifications could enhance the T-cell stimulatory properties of AML cells. AML cells were either cultured with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-4 (IL-4), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), or transfected with the CD80 (B7.1) gene and used as stimulator cells for primed and unprimed allogeneic T cells. Cytokine treatment increased HLA class I and II expression, but did not induce CD80 on AML cells. Cytokine-treated AML cells efficiently presented nominal and allo-antigens to primed T-cell clones, induced strong T-cell proliferation in HLA mismatched mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR), but failed to induce primary T-cell responses from an HLA identical bone marrow donor in MLR. In contrast, CD80-transfected AML cells induced T-cell proliferation of HLA-identical bone marrow donor peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) in primary MLR, allowing the generation of leukemia reactive CD4(+) T-cell lines and clones. The majority of the generated oligoclonal (25 of 35) T-cell cultures showed patient specific reactivity that did not discriminate between patient's leukemic cells and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B cells (EBV-LCL). The remaining 10 oligoclonal T-cell cultures recognized only leukemic cells. One of these latter leukemia reactive oligoclonal T cells was cloned. The majority of the clones (25 of 29) reacted against both leukemic cells and patient's EBV-LCL. A minority of the T-cell clones with the CD4 phenotype (four of 29) showed strong HLA-DP restricted reactivity against leukemic cells, but not against patient's EBV-LCL or against HLA-matched nonleukemic cells, indicating that their target antigens are preferentially expressed by leukemic cells. In conclusion, our study shows that the in vitro allogeneic T-cell response induced by CD80-transfected AML cells is mainly directed against patient's specific minor histocompatibility antigens, while antigens preferentially expressed by leukemic cells can also trigger T-cell responses.
尽管急性髓系白血病(AML)细胞表面的HLA I类和II类分子表达水平充足,但通常在体外无法诱导显著的T细胞反应。因此,我们研究了体外修饰是否能够增强AML细胞的T细胞刺激特性。AML细胞分别用粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)、白细胞介素-4(IL-4)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)培养,或转染CD80(B7.1)基因,并用作致敏和未致敏的同种异体T细胞的刺激细胞。细胞因子处理增加了HLA I类和II类分子的表达,但未在AML细胞上诱导出CD80。经细胞因子处理的AML细胞能够有效地将名义抗原和同种异体抗原呈递给致敏的T细胞克隆,在HLA错配的混合淋巴细胞反应(MLR)中诱导强烈的T细胞增殖,但在MLR中未能诱导来自HLA相同的骨髓供体的初始T细胞反应。相反,转染CD80的AML细胞在初次MLR中诱导了HLA相同的骨髓供体外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)的T细胞增殖,从而产生了白血病反应性CD4(+) T细胞系和克隆。所产生的大多数寡克隆(35个中的25个)T细胞培养物表现出患者特异性反应性,无法区分患者的白血病细胞和爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)转化的B细胞(EBV-LCL)。其余10个寡克隆T细胞培养物仅识别白血病细胞。其中一个白血病反应性寡克隆T细胞被克隆。大多数克隆(29个中的25个)对白血病细胞和患者的EBV-LCL均有反应。少数具有CD4表型的T细胞克隆(29个中的4个)表现出针对白血病细胞的强烈HLA-DP限制性反应性,但对患者的EBV-LCL或HLA匹配的非白血病细胞无反应,表明它们的靶抗原优先在白血病细胞上表达。总之,我们的研究表明,转染CD80的AML细胞在体外诱导的同种异体T细胞反应主要针对患者特异性的次要组织相容性抗原,而白血病细胞优先表达的抗原也可触发T细胞反应。