• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跗骨联合:MRI与CT的盲法比较

Tarsal coalition: a blinded comparison of MRI and CT.

作者信息

Emery K H, Bisset G S, Johnson N D, Nunan P J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229-8145, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Radiol. 1998 Aug;28(8):612-6. doi: 10.1007/s002470050430.

DOI:10.1007/s002470050430
PMID:9716636
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine how well MRI can detect tarsal coalition compared with CT, the current imaging standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Coronal and axial CT and MRI were performed within 3 weeks of each other on 40 feet in 20 consecutive patients referred with symptoms of possible tarsal coalition. Scans were read independently in blinded fashion by different imagers. Coalitions were either complete (osseous) or incomplete (non-osseous). Results were compared with available surgical data and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Both modalities prospectively identified 15 coalitions (9 patients) and each missed 1 calcaneonavicular coalition. Twenty-three of the remaining 24 feet were negative for coalition on both CT and MRI. An atypical incomplete talocalcaneal coalition seen on CT was not identified prospectively on MRI.

CONCLUSION

MRI is very good for detecting tarsal coalition and has a high rate of agreement with CT, the imaging "gold standard." When clinical suspicion for coalition is high, CT remains a more cost-effective diagnostic modality. If other causes for ankle pain are also entertained, MRI can be performed and provide nearly equivalent diagnostic accuracy for detecting tarsal coalition.

摘要

目的

与当前成像标准CT相比,确定MRI检测跗骨联合的效果如何。

材料与方法

对连续20例因可能存在跗骨联合症状而转诊的患者的40只足,在3周内先后进行了冠状位和轴位CT及MRI检查。扫描结果由不同的影像诊断医师以盲法独立解读。联合可为完全性(骨性)或不完全性(非骨性)。将结果与现有的手术数据及临床随访情况进行比较。

结果

两种检查方法均前瞻性地发现了15例联合(9例患者),且均漏诊了1例跟舟联合。其余24只足中的23只在CT和MRI上均未发现联合。CT上所见的1例不典型不完全距跟联合在MRI上未被前瞻性地识别。

结论

MRI在检测跗骨联合方面表现出色,与成像“金标准”CT的符合率很高。当临床对联合的怀疑程度较高时,CT仍是一种更具成本效益的诊断方法。如果还考虑踝关节疼痛的其他原因,则可进行MRI检查,其在检测跗骨联合方面能提供几乎同等的诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Tarsal coalition: a blinded comparison of MRI and CT.跗骨联合:MRI与CT的盲法比较
Pediatr Radiol. 1998 Aug;28(8):612-6. doi: 10.1007/s002470050430.
2
[Synostosis and tarsal coalitions in children. A study of 68 cases in 47 patients].[儿童的骨性连接和跗骨联合。47例患者68例病例的研究]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1994;80(3):252-60.
3
Computed tomography in suspected tarsal coalition. Examination of 26 cases.疑似跗骨联合的计算机断层扫描。26例病例检查。
Acta Orthop Scand. 1990 Dec;61(6):554-7. doi: 10.3109/17453679008993582.
4
Child calcaneonavicular coalitions: MRI diagnostic value in a 19-case series.儿童跟舟骰骨联合:19 例系列的 MRI 诊断价值。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Feb;97(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.09.015. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
5
Evaluation of tarsal coalition by computed tomography.通过计算机断层扫描评估跗骨联合。
J Pediatr Orthop. 1984 May;4(3):365-9. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198405000-00016.
6
A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet.对100例尸体足部跗骨联合进行的解剖及计算机断层扫描研究。
J Orthop Res. 2003 Mar;21(2):352-8. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00131-6.
7
Tarsal coalition: depiction and characterization with CT and MR imaging.跗骨联合:CT与MR成像的显示及特征分析
Radiology. 1994 Nov;193(2):447-52. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972761.
8
MRI of tarsal coalition: frequency, distribution, and innovative signs.跗骨联合的磁共振成像:发生率、分布及创新征象
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(1):14-21.
9
Features of calcaneonavicular coalition on coronal computed tomography.跟舟联合在冠状位计算机断层扫描上的特征
Skeletal Radiol. 2000 Jul;29(7):409-12. doi: 10.1007/s002560000211.
10
How accurate is MRI for diagnosing tarsal coalitions? A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.MRI 诊断跗骨联合的准确性如何?一项回顾性诊断准确性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):3493-3502. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10304-z. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
How accurate is MRI for diagnosing tarsal coalitions? A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.MRI 诊断跗骨联合的准确性如何?一项回顾性诊断准确性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):3493-3502. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10304-z. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
2
VIBE MRI: an alternative to CT in the imaging of sports-related osseous pathology?VIBE MRI:运动相关骨病变影像学检查的 CT 替代方法?
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1088):20170815. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170815. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
Talocalcaneal coalition: A focus on radiographic findings and sites of bridging.
距跟联合:关注影像学表现及桥接部位
Indian J Orthop. 2016 Nov-Dec;50(6):661-668. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.193473.
4
Metatarsal Coalition Complicated by Interdigital Neuroma.合并趾间神经瘤的跖骨联合
Radiol Case Rep. 2016 Jan 5;4(2):286. doi: 10.2484/rcr.v4i2.286. eCollection 2009.
5
Posteromedial subtalar coalitions: prevalence and associated morphological alterations of the sustentaculum tali.距下关节后内侧联合:跟骨载距突的患病率及相关形态学改变
Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Jul;46(8):1142-9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3584-0. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
A radiological classification system for talocalcaneal coalition based on a multi-planar imaging study using CT and MRI.基于 CT 和 MRI 多平面成像研究的跟距骨桥的放射学分类系统。
Insights Imaging. 2013 Oct;4(5):563-7. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0267-3. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
7
An unusual cause of ankle pain: fracture of a talocalcaneal coalition as a differential diagnosis in an acute ankle sprain: a case report and literature review.一种不常见的踝关节疼痛病因:距跟骨桥骨折作为急性踝关节扭伤的鉴别诊断:病例报告及文献复习。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 26;14:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-111.
8
Talocalcaneal coalition in a 15 year old female basketball player.一名15岁女性篮球运动员的距跟联合
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2010 Dec;54(4):222-8.
9
CT of the musculoskeletal system: what is left is the days of MRI?肌肉骨骼系统的CT:MRI的时代还剩下什么?
Eur Radiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):152-64. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1129-0. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
10
[Calcaneonavicular coalition fracture. A rare differential diagnosis of post-traumatic ankle pain].[跟舟联合骨折。创伤后踝关节疼痛的一种罕见鉴别诊断]
Unfallchirurg. 2008 Nov;111(11):944-50. doi: 10.1007/s00113-008-1437-5.