• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Two routes to privacy protection: a comparison of health information legislation in Canada and the United States.

作者信息

Plater S, Seeley E, Dixon L A

机构信息

Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia, Victoria, Canada.

出版信息

J Womens Health. 1998 Aug;7(6):665-72. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.665.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.1998.7.665
PMID:9718535
Abstract

The privacy of health information is a subject of great sensitivity in both Canada and the United States. As a result of public demands for more effective protection of such information as medical records, Canada and, particularly, its provincial governments, have implemented extensive legislation. The United States, on the other hand, has largely confined its efforts to private sector initiatives that are more reflective of voluntary codes than legal statutes. Because new technologic developments facilitate data sharing in the medical field, especially in the face of a continual reduction of healthcare budgets, the concern for privacy protection in this domain has intensified. Correspondingly, there has been a gradual theoretical shift in protective health information policies on both sides of the border. As Canada pushes to extend its federal and provincial legislation to the private sector, the United States is on the brink of approving a national bill that would protect the privacy of personal medical records. It is becoming evident that efforts to secure the privacy of health information in both countries are converging.

摘要

相似文献

1
Two routes to privacy protection: a comparison of health information legislation in Canada and the United States.
J Womens Health. 1998 Aug;7(6):665-72. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.665.
2
The effect of the proposed national data protection regime on the health sector in Australia.拟议的国家数据保护制度对澳大利亚卫生部门的影响。
Aust Health Rev. 1997;20(1):1-17; discussion 18-30. doi: 10.1071/ah970001.
3
Fate of federal privacy legislation far from certain.联邦隐私立法的命运远未确定。
Health Data Manag. 1997 Sep;5(9):66, 68, 70-1.
4
Bennett's medical privacy bill would pre-empt State HIV laws.贝内特的医疗隐私法案将取代州立艾滋病病毒相关法律。
AIDS Policy Law. 1999 May 14;14(9):2.
5
Current developments in Canadian privacy and information law: implications for telehealth.加拿大隐私与信息法的当前发展:对远程医疗的影响。
J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6 Suppl 2:S83-5. doi: 10.1258/1357633001935716.
6
Public/private information sharing in healthcare fraud investigations.医疗保健欺诈调查中的公共/私人信息共享。
J Health Law. 1999 Fall;32(4):593-620.
7
Identity cards and databases in health care: the need for federal privacy protections.
Columbia J Law Soc Probl. 1995 Winter;28(2):253-96.
8
Cancer surveillance and information: balancing public health with privacy and confidentiality concerns (United States).癌症监测与信息:平衡公共卫生与隐私及保密问题(美国)
Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Jun;17(5):633-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0002-1.
9
Canada's privacy legislation warning.
Lancet. 1997 Oct 11;350(9084):1085.
10
Privacy of genetic information: a review of the laws in the United States.遗传信息隐私:美国法律综述
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1292-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Public opinions about participating in health research.公众对参与健康研究的看法。
Can J Public Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;101(2):159-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03404364.