• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[1989 - 1994年丹麦临床生理学/核医学科室的科学活动。“影响力”与被引频次的文献计量分析]

[Scientific activities in departments of clinical physiology/nuclear medicine in Denmark during the period 1989-1994. A bibliometric analysis of the "impact" and citation frequency].

作者信息

Hansen H B, Brinch K, Henriksen J H

机构信息

Hvidovre Hospital, klinisk fysiologisk/nuklearmedicinske afdeling.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Aug 3;160(32):4621-5.

PMID:9719741
Abstract

This study reports a bibliometric analysis of 860 scientific publications of which 763 are papers in scientific journals emanating from departments of clinical physiology and nuclear medicine in Denmark in the years 1989-1994. The number of publications decreased significantly over time. The 763 papers were published in 239 different scientific journals, 80% in journals with an official "impact factor". The average impact per paper remained almost constant over time and was significantly above the national average. A close relationship was found between the number of papers from a department and its cumulated impact. In an analysis of 217 papers a direct relation was found between the journal impact factor and the citation factor. A linear relation was found between cumulated citations and time, and the number of citations per year reached a maximum 3-7 years after publication, whereas the general maximum for all medical specialties is 2-3 years. It is concluded that the total number of scientific papers from Danish departments of clinical physiology & nuclear medicine fell in the years 1989-1991, but the impact per paper was almost constant and above the national average. There seems to be a good agreement between journal impact factor and overall citation frequency in papers from clinical physiology & nuclear medicine.

摘要

本研究报告了对860篇科学出版物的文献计量分析,其中763篇是1989年至1994年间丹麦临床生理学和核医学部门发表在科学期刊上的论文。出版物数量随时间显著减少。这763篇论文发表在239种不同的科学期刊上,80%发表在具有官方“影响因子”的期刊上。每篇论文的平均影响力随时间几乎保持不变,且显著高于全国平均水平。发现一个部门的论文数量与其累积影响力之间存在密切关系。在对217篇论文的分析中,发现期刊影响因子与被引因子之间存在直接关系。累积被引次数与时间之间存在线性关系,每年的被引次数在发表后3至7年达到最大值,而所有医学专业的一般最大值为2至3年。得出的结论是,1989年至1991年间,丹麦临床生理学和核医学部门的科学论文总数有所下降,但每篇论文的影响力几乎保持不变且高于全国平均水平。临床生理学和核医学论文的期刊影响因子与总体被引频率之间似乎有很好的一致性。

相似文献

1
[Scientific activities in departments of clinical physiology/nuclear medicine in Denmark during the period 1989-1994. A bibliometric analysis of the "impact" and citation frequency].[1989 - 1994年丹麦临床生理学/核医学科室的科学活动。“影响力”与被引频次的文献计量分析]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Aug 3;160(32):4621-5.
2
Scientific publications from departments of clinical physiology and nuclear medicine in Denmark. A bibliometric analysis of "impact' in the years 1989-1994.丹麦临床生理学和核医学部门的科学出版物。1989 - 1994年“影响力”的文献计量分析。
Clin Physiol. 1996 Sep;16(5):507-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1996.tb01016.x.
3
[Publication outcome of research funding by the Danish Heart Foundation 1988-1990].[丹麦心脏基金会1988 - 1990年研究资金的出版成果]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Aug 3;160(32):4644-8.
4
[Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].[乳腺病理学:基于文献计量指标对葡萄牙科研活动的评估]
Acta Med Port. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):225-34. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
5
[Trends concerning medical articles 1989-1998. A study of Danish articles compared to other members of the European Union].[1989 - 1998年医学文章的趋势。丹麦文章与欧盟其他成员国文章的比较研究]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Nov 15;161(46):6339-43.
6
The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.法医学期刊的分布、关于作者署名做法的思考、同行评审以及影响因子的作用。
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):115-28. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
7
[The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production].[影响因子:一个有影响力的因素还是(唯一)一个因素的影响力?作为评估科研成果工具候选的文献计量指标的局限性]
Ann Ital Med Int. 1999 Apr-Jun;14(2):130-3; discussion 134-5.
8
[Evaluation and evolution of the scientific production by Spanish anesthesiology departments].[西班牙麻醉科的科研成果评估与发展]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2002 Jun-Jul;49(6):306-13.
9
[Scientific publishing in the journal Nuclear Medicine].[发表于《核医学杂志》的科学论文]
Nuklearmedizin. 2002;41(4):171-7.
10
The impact of biomedical literature published in the province of Vojvodina on researchers in the world and in Yugoslavia.伏伊伏丁那省发表的生物医学文献对世界和南斯拉夫研究人员的影响。
Med Pregl. 2001 Jan-Feb;54(1-2):21-33.