Suppr超能文献

头孢克洛与头孢呋辛酯治疗阿莫西林治疗失败的儿童急性分泌性中耳炎的比较。

Comparison of cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute otitis media with effusion in children who failed amoxicillin therapy.

作者信息

Turik M A, Johns D

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1998 Aug;10(4):306-12. doi: 10.1179/joc.1998.10.4.306.

Abstract

This trial compared the efficacy and safety of a 10-day treatment course of cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute otitis media with effusion in children who failed therapy with amoxicillin. This was an investigator-blind, randomized, parallel treatment group study. To be included, patients must have received treatment with a standard clinical regimen of amoxicillin for at least 48 hours and not more than 10 days, with the last dose within 72 hours of randomization. Patients who met the entry criteria were randomly assigned to one of two antibiotic treatment groups. Cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil suspensions were administered twice daily for a total daily dose of 40 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg, respectively. Physical examination, pneumatic otoscopy and tympanogram were performed to evaluate efficacy to therapy. Therapeutic equivalence was established by ruling out a difference (cefaclor minus cefuroxime axetil) of 15% in percentages of clinical success (cure plus improvement). Safety evaluation was performed by assessment of clinical adverse events. In the intent-to-treat analysis post-therapy (1-6 days after completion of therapy), 96 of 104 (92.3%) cefaclor-treated patients had clinical success compared to 90 of 101 (89.1%) cefuroxime axetil patients. The 95% confidence limits on the difference between proportions of favorable outcomes (cefaclor minus cefuroxime axetil) was from -4.8% to +11.2%. At termination of the study (day 10-16 after completion of therapy), 86 of 104 (82.7%) cefaclor patients and 84 of 101 (83.2%) cefuroxime axetil patients had favorable clinical outcomes (95% confidence interval: -10.8% to +9.9%). Thirty-two (30.8%) of the 104 patients in the cefaclor treatment group reported at least one adverse event, with rhinitis reported in 9 (8.7%) patients and cough increased in 7 (6.7%) patients. Thirty-six (35.6%) of the 101 patients in the cefuroxime axetil treatment group reported at least one event, with diarrhea reported in 11 (10.9%) of patients and rhinitis in 10 (9.9%) patients. Cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil were equally effective in the treatment of patients with acute otitis media with effusion who had failed therapy with amoxicillin. Significantly fewer patients treated with cefaclor reported diarrhea, which is the most frequently reported adverse event in children treated with antibiotics for this disease.

摘要

本试验比较了头孢克洛和头孢呋辛酯10天疗程治疗阿莫西林治疗失败的儿童急性分泌性中耳炎的疗效和安全性。这是一项研究者盲法、随机、平行治疗组研究。纳入的患者必须接受标准临床方案的阿莫西林治疗至少48小时且不超过10天,最后一剂在随机分组前72小时内。符合入选标准的患者被随机分配到两个抗生素治疗组之一。头孢克洛和头孢呋辛酯混悬液每日给药两次,总日剂量分别为40mg/kg和30mg/kg。进行体格检查、鼓气耳镜检查和鼓室图以评估治疗效果。通过排除临床成功率(治愈加改善)百分比中15%的差异(头孢克洛减去头孢呋辛酯)来确定治疗等效性。通过评估临床不良事件进行安全性评估。在意向性治疗分析中(治疗后1 - 6天,即治疗完成后),104例接受头孢克洛治疗的患者中有96例(92.3%)临床成功,而101例接受头孢呋辛酯治疗的患者中有90例(89.1%)临床成功。有利结局比例差异(头孢克洛减去头孢呋辛酯)的95%置信区间为 - 4.8%至 + 11.2%。在研究结束时(治疗完成后第10 - 16天),104例头孢克洛患者中有86例(82.7%)和101例头孢呋辛酯患者中有84例(83.2%)有良好的临床结局(95%置信区间: - 10.8%至 + 9.9%)。头孢克洛治疗组的104例患者中有32例(30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验