Savitsky J C, Muskin R, Czyzewski D, Eckert J
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(3):235-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00917761.
Male juvenile offenders were asked to evaluate the work of an experimental partner (confederate) who completed a work task four times. The work partner cheated on two trials and did not cheat on two trials while working for a charity (one cheat and one noncheat trial) or for selfish gain (one cheat and one noncheat trial). It was found that subjects rated the work done on cheating trials lower than work done on noncheating trials. In addition, subjects shared less reward money on cheating trials relative to noncheating trials. However, the intentions of the conferate, defined as the reward recipient, failed to affect subjects' judgments. These results were described as supporting previous studies which have indicated that delinquent fail to account of others' intentions when making moral judgments.
男性少年犯被要求对一名实验搭档（同谋）的工作进行评价，该搭档完成一项工作任务四次。工作搭档在为慈善机构工作时（一次作弊试验和一次非作弊试验）或为谋取私利时（一次作弊试验和一次非作弊试验），在两次试验中作弊，在两次试验中未作弊。结果发现，受试者对作弊试验中完成的工作评价低于非作弊试验中完成的工作。此外，与非作弊试验相比，受试者在作弊试验中分享的奖励金额更少。然而，作为奖励接受者的同谋的意图未能影响受试者的判断。这些结果被描述为支持先前的研究，这些研究表明，青少年在做出道德判断时没有考虑他人的意图。
