• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

涡轮气腔的污染:交叉感染的风险。

Contamination of the turbine air chamber: a risk of cross infection.

作者信息

Checchi L, Montebugnoli L, Samaritani S

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Aug;25(8):607-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02495.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02495.x
PMID:9722263
Abstract

In the present work, we evaluated (a) the influx of contaminating fluid into the air chamber when a high-speed turbine stops rotating, (b) the significance of a series of variables (type of handpiece and dental unit, shape of the bur, number of stops set on the turbine) which condition it, and (c) the time required to expel the contaminating fluid from the turbine head. Results showed that contamination takes place every time the turbine stops rotating with the bur in contact with an external fluid. The main variable affecting the influx of contaminating fluid into the air chamber of the turbine head was represented by the shape of the bur (F=54.9; p<0.01). Another significant variable was the type of handpiece and dental unit (F=7.3; p<0.01). The number of stops set on the turbine was irrelevant (F=0.03; p=n.s.). The expulsion of the contaminant from the turbine head showed 2 different exponential rates: a very rapid-elimination phase within 30 s and a slow-elimination phase between 60 and 300 s. In order to remove over 99% of the contaminant from the air chamber, a turbine had to run for more than 4-7 min depending on the type of the handpiece. In conclusion, data from the present study suggest that a significant cross-infection potential exists with high-speed handpieces whenever they are only externally scrubbed and disinfected so the internal cleaning and sterilization between patients is mandatory. The practice of flushing by running the turbines between patients should be discouraged.

摘要

在本研究中,我们评估了:(a)高速涡轮停止转动时污染液体流入气腔的情况;(b)一系列影响该情况的变量(手机和牙科设备的类型、车针形状、涡轮设定的停止次数)的重要性;(c)从涡轮机头排出污染液体所需的时间。结果表明,每当涡轮停止转动且车针接触外部液体时就会发生污染。影响污染液体流入涡轮机头气腔的主要变量是车针形状(F=54.9;p<0.01)。另一个重要变量是手机和牙科设备的类型(F=7.3;p<0.01)。涡轮设定的停止次数无关紧要(F=0.03;p无统计学意义)。从涡轮机头排出污染物呈现出两种不同的指数速率:30秒内的快速消除阶段和60至300秒之间的缓慢消除阶段。为了从气腔中去除超过99%的污染物,根据手机类型,涡轮必须运行4至7分钟以上。总之,本研究数据表明,只要高速手机仅进行外部擦洗和消毒,就存在显著的交叉感染风险,因此患者之间进行内部清洁和消毒是强制性的。应不鼓励在患者之间通过运行涡轮进行冲洗的做法。

相似文献

1
Contamination of the turbine air chamber: a risk of cross infection.涡轮气腔的污染:交叉感染的风险。
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Aug;25(8):607-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02495.x.
2
Effectiveness of two devices designed to prevent fluid retraction in a high-speed handpiece.两种旨在防止高速手机中液体回流的装置的有效性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Aug;84(2):225-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.108414.
3
Prevention of microbial contamination of the dental unit caused by suction into the turbine drive air lines.预防涡轮驱动空气管路因吸力导致牙科设备受到微生物污染。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Jan;81(1):50-2. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80147-8.
4
Comparison of cutting efficiencies between electric and air-turbine dental handpieces.电动和气动牙科手机切割效率的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Feb;103(2):101-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60013-3.
5
In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.十种不同旋转切割器械切割效率及产热的体外比较。第二部分:电动手机及与涡轮手机的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 May;101(5):319-31. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60064-0.
6
Microbiological evaluation of a newly designed dental air-turbine handpiece for anti-cross contaminations.一种新设计的用于防止交叉污染的牙科气涡轮手机的微生物学评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 1994 May-Jun;7(3):201-8.
7
Effect of steam sterilization inside the turbine chambers of dental turbines.牙科涡轮机涡轮腔内部蒸汽灭菌的效果
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Feb;87(2):184-8. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70271-4.
8
Dental air turbine handpiece performance testing.牙科空气涡轮手机性能测试。
Aust Dent J. 1995 Oct;40(5):330-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb04823.x.
9
Cross-infection risks associated with current procedures for using high-speed dental handpieces.与当前高速牙科手机使用程序相关的交叉感染风险。
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):401-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.401-406.1992.
10
[A study on bacterial contamination of dental handpieces].[牙科手机细菌污染的研究]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001 Apr;19(2):93-4, 98.

引用本文的文献

1
Extra Positive Air Pressure to Prevent Microbial Contamination in Dental Handpieces: An Experimental Study.额外正压预防牙科手机微生物污染:一项实验研究。
Int Dent J. 2025 Aug 4;75(5):100917. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100917.
2
Variation of Efficacy of Filtering Face Pieces Respirators over Time in a Dental Setting: A Pilot Study.牙科环境中过滤式面罩呼吸器随时间的效能变化:一项初步研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;9(4):36. doi: 10.3390/dj9040036.
3
COVID-19 Dentistry-Related Aspects: A Literature Overview.COVID-19 牙科相关方面:文献综述。
Int Dent J. 2021 Feb;71(1):21-26. doi: 10.1111/idj.12601. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
4
Evaluation of microbial contamination and distribution of sulphate-reducing bacteria in dental units.评价牙科治疗设备中的微生物污染和硫酸盐还原菌的分布。
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Jan;184(1):133-9. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-1952-7. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
5
Development of a validated process for manual preparation of dental transmission instruments.手动制备牙科传递器械的经过验证的流程的开发。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):605-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0425-7. Epub 2010 May 19.
6
Italian multicenter study on infection hazards during dental practice: control of environmental microbial contamination in public dental surgeries.意大利关于牙科诊疗过程中感染风险的多中心研究:公共牙科诊所环境微生物污染的控制
BMC Public Health. 2008 May 29;8:187. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-187.
7
Prions and dentistry.朊病毒与牙科
J R Soc Med. 2002 Apr;95(4):178-81. doi: 10.1177/014107680209500404.