Malpas S C
Department of Physiology, Auckland University, New Zealand.
Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Oct;56(1):65-96. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00030-6.
This review focuses on that most engaging feature of the sympathetic nervous system, its rhythmicity. In particular examining the nature of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA), its characteristics, the frequencies of these rhythms and possible mechanisms responsible for their generation. Sympathetic activity can be thought of as a complex output of the central nervous system providing subtle control over end organ function. This control is exerted in a number of frequency bands including rhythms related to the cardiac and respiratory cycles, 10 Hz, and between 0.2 and 0.4 Hz. The generation and control over the occurrence of each of these rhythms is likely to be quite separate. Although afferent feedback from sources such as baroreceptors can explain some of the rhythmical properties in each case there is good evidence for inherent generation of aspects of these rhythms. A variety of brainstem cell groups are thought to be involved in their generation with the rostral ventrolateral medulla, although unlikely to be solely responsible for tone generation, an important regulator of overall activity. SNA also varies in the number of nerves recruited to fire in each synchronized discharge. Little is known about this control other than it appears to be quite separate from the control over the timing of discharges. Spinal cord mechanisms are possibly involved. SNA frequencies above 0.7 Hz do not appear to directly induce oscillations in innervated vasculature, however, are likely to contribute to setting the level of vasconstrictive tone. Slower frequencies appear to directly cause oscillations in blood flow.
本综述聚焦于交感神经系统最引人关注的特征,即其节律性。特别探讨了交感神经活动(SNA)的本质、其特征、这些节律的频率以及产生这些节律的可能机制。交感神经活动可被视为中枢神经系统的一种复杂输出,对终末器官功能进行精细控制。这种控制在多个频段发挥作用,包括与心脏和呼吸周期相关的节律、10赫兹以及0.2至0.4赫兹之间的节律。这些节律中每一种的产生和控制可能是相当独立的。尽管来自压力感受器等来源的传入反馈可以解释每种情况下的一些节律特性,但有充分证据表明这些节律的某些方面是内在产生的。多种脑干细胞群被认为参与了它们的产生,延髓头端腹外侧区虽然不太可能单独负责紧张性产生,但却是整体活动的重要调节者。SNA在每次同步放电中发放冲动的神经数量也有所不同。除了它似乎与放电时间的控制完全分开之外,人们对这种控制知之甚少。脊髓机制可能也参与其中。高于0.7赫兹的SNA频率似乎不会直接在受支配的血管中诱发振荡,然而,可能有助于设定血管收缩紧张度的水平。较慢的频率似乎会直接导致血流振荡。