• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor underdosing on rehospitalization rates in congestive heart failure.

作者信息

Luzier A B, Forrest A, Adelman M, Hawari F I, Schentag J J, Izzo J L

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, State University of New York at Buffalo, Millard Fillmore Health System, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Aug 15;82(4):465-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00361-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00361-0
PMID:9723634
Abstract

In a retrospective, cohort design, clinical usage of digoxin, diuretic, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor was assessed in all patients readmitted over a 36-month period for congestive heart failure (CHF) diagnostic-related group (DRG) 127. ACE inhibitor dose-response analysis used the discharge dose of ACE inhibitor, converted to enalapril-equivalent doses and adjusted for renal function. Principal end points were time-to-readmission and 90-day readmission rate. Of 314 total patients, digoxin was used in 72%, diuretic in 86%, and 67% received an ACE inhibitor. Only 22% of those on an ACE inhibitor received currently recommended doses of enalapril > or = 20 mg/day or equivalent, whereas 41% received enalapril < or = 5 mg/day. Time-to-readmission was increased by an ACE inhibitor (p = 0.002) but not digoxin or diuretic. An ACE inhibitor was the principal covariate of 90-day readmission rate (p <0.05). The readmission rate was not reduced with daily ACE inhibitor doses of < or = 5 mg enalapril, whereas daily doses of > or = 10 mg enalapril reduced 90-day readmission rates by 28% compared to those receiving diuretic or digoxin therapy (p <0.05). Using a dynamic model, the dose required to achieve 90% to 95% of the theoretical maximum ACE inhibitor effect exceeded 100 mg enalapril daily. Thus, CHF readmission rates are lower when daily ACE inhibitor doses exceed 5 mg enalapril or the equivalent daily, but are unaffected by digoxin or diuretic. Modeled maximum ACE inhibitor benefits require doses 8- to 10-fold higher than current usage patterns.

摘要

相似文献

1
Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor underdosing on rehospitalization rates in congestive heart failure.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Aug 15;82(4):465-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00361-0.
2
Do evidence-based treatments provide incremental benefits to patients with congestive heart failure already receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors? A secondary analysis of one-year outcomes from the Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival (ATLAS) study.循证治疗能否为已经接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗的充血性心力衰竭患者带来额外益处?赖诺普利治疗与生存评估(ATLAS)研究一年期结果的二次分析。
Clin Ther. 2004 May;26(5):694-703. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90069-0.
3
The effects of enalapril-digoxin-diuretic combination therapy on nutritional and anthropometric indices in chronic congestive heart failure: preliminary findings in cardiac cachexia.依那普利 - 地高辛 - 利尿剂联合治疗对慢性充血性心力衰竭患者营养和人体测量指标的影响:心脏恶病质的初步研究结果
Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Jun;3(3):359-63. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00146-x.
4
[Pharmacogenomic control of angiotensin converting enzyme gene I/D polymorphism predominant risk factor of development of chronic heart failure and target of enalapril treatment].
Kardiologiia. 2013;53(3):9-14.
5
Patterns of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescriptions, educational interventions, and outcomes among hospitalized patients with heart failure.住院心力衰竭患者中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂处方模式、教育干预措施及治疗结果
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Apr;21(4):261-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210406.
6
Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and digoxin on health outcomes of very old patients with heart failure. SAGE Study Group. Systematic Assessment of Geriatric drug use via Epidemiology.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和地高辛对高龄心力衰竭患者健康结局的影响。SAGE研究组。通过流行病学对老年药物使用进行系统评估。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jan 10;160(1):53-60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.1.53.
7
ACE-inhibitor therapy at relatively high doses and risk of renal worsening in chronic heart failure.ACE 抑制剂高剂量治疗与慢性心力衰竭肾脏恶化风险。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Dec;97(6):507-16. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000100. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
8
Patterns of pharmacologic treatment of congestive heart failure in elderly nursing home residents and related issues: a review of the literature.老年疗养院居民充血性心力衰竭的药物治疗模式及相关问题:文献综述
Clin Ther. 2003 Jul;25(7):1918-35. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80196-0.
9
Community pharmacist outreach program directed at physicians treating congestive heart failure.针对治疗充血性心力衰竭的医生的社区药剂师外展项目。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000 Apr 15;57(8):747-52. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/57.8.747.
10
Comparison of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of congestive heart failure.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗充血性心力衰竭的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jan 15;95(2):283-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.097.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-Therapy Problems and Predictors among Hospitalized Heart-Failure Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.住院心力衰竭患者的药物治疗问题及预测因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2020 Dec 22;12:281-291. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S268923. eCollection 2020.
2
Sacubitril/valsartan vs. angiotensin receptor inhibition in heart failure: a real-world study in Taiwan.沙库巴曲缬沙坦与血管紧张素受体抑制剂治疗心力衰竭的比较:台湾地区的一项真实世界研究
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):3003-3012. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12924. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
3
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Sep;13(9):667-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00508.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
4
The dilemma, causes and approaches to avoid recurrent hospital readmissions for patients with chronic heart failure.慢性心力衰竭患者再次住院的困境、原因和避免方法。
Heart Fail Rev. 2012 May;17(3):345-53. doi: 10.1007/s10741-011-9256-0.
5
Turning 65 in Ontario: the impact of public drug benefit coverage on hospitalizations for acute and chronic disease.安大略省年满65岁:公共药物福利覆盖对急慢性疾病住院治疗的影响。
Healthc Policy. 2006 Mar;1(3):87-98.
6
Perceived barriers for treatment of chronic heart failure in general practice; are they affecting performance?全科医疗中慢性心力衰竭治疗的感知障碍;它们会影响治疗效果吗?
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 May 3;6(1):19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-19.
7
Physician, organisational and patient characteristics explaining the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure treatment: a multilevel study.解释血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在心力衰竭治疗中使用情况的医生、组织和患者特征:一项多层次研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;61(2):145-51. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0897-6. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
8
The problem of underdosing of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is markedly overrated: results from a study of patients discharged from hospital after an acute myocardial infarction.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂用药不足的问题被明显高估了:一项针对急性心肌梗死后出院患者的研究结果。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 May;60(3):205-10. doi: 10.1007/s00228-004-0744-1. Epub 2004 Mar 19.
9
Adverse effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure and/or ventricular dysfunction : meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对慢性心力衰竭和/或心室功能障碍患者的不良反应:随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Drug Saf. 2003;26(12):895-908. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326120-00004.
10
How high should an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker be dosed in patients with diabetic nephropathy?对于糖尿病肾病患者,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的用药剂量应多高?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2003 Oct;5(5):418-25. doi: 10.1007/s11906-003-0088-8.