• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯静脉搭桥术:策略与长期结果

Sequential vein bypass grafting: tactics and long-term results.

作者信息

Christenson J T, Simonet F, Schmuziger M

机构信息

The Cardiovascular Surgery Unit, Columbia Hôpital de la Tour, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Aug;6(4):389-97. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(98)00024-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0967-2109(98)00024-6
PMID:9725519
Abstract

The sequential bypass grafting technique has many advantages over coronary artery bypass grafting with single grafts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the consequences of sequential bypass graft failure. Between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 1996, 3846 patients underwent primary coronary artery bypass vein grafting. A total of 3490 patients received sequential vein bypass grafts and 356 patients received single vein bypass grafts (9%). There were 6177 sequential bypass grafts (3490 postero-lateral grafts (56%) and 2687 in the antero-lateral position (44%)) and 1468 single grafts (972 vein grafts and 496 internal thoracic artery grafts). Overall, there were 80 hospital deaths (2.1%). Mortality in relation to type of grafts used was: 13 deaths in 356 patients with only single graft (3.7%) and 67 deaths in 3490 patients who received sequential vein grafts (1.9%). Of 3766 hospital survivors, 3731 were followed for an average of 76 months. During follow-up, 85 patients died (2.3%), 15 patients (0.4%) underwent cardiac transplantation and 52 (1.4%) had re-do coronary artery bypass vein grafting. Graft-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed in 56 patients (1.5%), 37/1390 single bypass grafts (2.7%) and 19/6023 sequential bypass grafts (0.3%). There were 272/6023 symptomatic sequential graft occlusions (4.5%) (182 were in postero-lateral position and 90 in the antero-lateral position). There were 66/667 single vein graft occlusions (9.9%) and 15 symptomatic internal thoracic artery graft occlusions (2.1%) during follow-up. In 97% of patients, presenting symptoms of postero-lateral sequential bypass graft occlusion took the form of a renewed angina with a myocardial infarction rate of 3% and a mortality rate of 7%. Corresponding figures for antero-lateral sequential bypass grafts were 22, 78 and 68%, and anterior single vein bypass grafts were 70, 30 and 15%, respectively. The overall 10-year survival rate in patients with sequential bypass grafts was 81.2% and the cumulative patency rate (1464 angio-controls of 2576 sequential vein grafts) was 72.2%. A symptomatic occlusion of a postero-lateral sequential vein bypass results in a low incidence of myocardial infarction with low mortality, when the terminal anastomosis is connected to a high flow vessel. An antero-lateral sequential vein bypass graft has better long-term patency than single vein bypass, but should occlusion occur, it would usually be associated with a higher myocardial infarction and mortality rates than a single vein graft. The highest risk for failure of a sequential graft in the antero-lateral position occurs when the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is small or severely diseased. In this situation the single graft technique with internal thoracic artery appears to be safer.

摘要

序贯搭桥技术相较于单支血管冠状动脉搭桥术具有诸多优势。本研究旨在评估序贯搭桥失败的后果。在1984年1月1日至1996年12月31日期间,3846例患者接受了初次冠状动脉搭桥静脉移植术。共有3490例患者接受了序贯静脉搭桥,356例患者接受了单支静脉搭桥(9%)。共有6177例序贯搭桥(3490例在后外侧位置(56%),2687例在前外侧位置(44%))以及1468例单支血管搭桥(972例静脉搭桥和496例胸廓内动脉搭桥)。总体而言,有80例医院死亡(2.1%)。与所使用的血管移植物类型相关的死亡率为:356例仅接受单支血管搭桥的患者中有13例死亡(3.7%),3490例接受序贯静脉搭桥的患者中有67例死亡(1.9%)。在3766例医院幸存者中,3731例患者平均随访76个月。随访期间,85例患者死亡(2.3%),15例患者(0.4%)接受了心脏移植,52例患者(1.4%)进行了再次冠状动脉搭桥静脉移植术。56例患者(1.5%)进行了血管腔内冠状动脉成形术,其中37/1390例单支血管搭桥(2.7%),19/6023例序贯搭桥(0.3%)。6023例序贯搭桥中有272例(4.5%)出现有症状的闭塞(182例在后外侧位置,90例在前外侧位置)。随访期间,667例单支静脉搭桥中有66例(9.9%)闭塞,15例胸廓内动脉搭桥出现有症状的闭塞(2.1%)。在97%的患者中,后外侧序贯搭桥闭塞的症状表现为再次出现心绞痛,心肌梗死发生率为3%,死亡率为7%。前外侧序贯搭桥的相应数字分别为22%、78%和68%,前侧单支静脉搭桥的相应数字分别为70%、30%和15%。序贯搭桥患者的总体10年生存率为81.2%,累积通畅率(对2576例序贯静脉搭桥进行了1464次血管造影检查)为72.2%。当终末吻合口连接到高流量血管时,后外侧序贯静脉搭桥有症状的闭塞导致心肌梗死发生率低且死亡率低。前外侧序贯静脉搭桥的长期通畅性优于单支静脉搭桥,但一旦发生闭塞,通常比单支静脉搭桥伴有更高的心肌梗死和死亡率。当左前降支动脉(LAD)细小或严重病变时,前外侧序贯搭桥失败的风险最高。在这种情况下,采用胸廓内动脉的单支血管搭桥技术似乎更安全。

相似文献

1
Sequential vein bypass grafting: tactics and long-term results.序贯静脉搭桥术:策略与长期结果
Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Aug;6(4):389-97. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(98)00024-6.
2
How serious is a proximal occlusion of a posterolateral sequential bypass?后外侧序贯旁路近端闭塞有多严重?
Tex Heart Inst J. 1996;23(3):201-6.
3
Perioperative observations of different bypass modes of a right coronary system based on instantaneous blood flow during the operation.基于手术过程中瞬时血流的右冠状动脉系统不同旁路模式的围手术期观察。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 14;15(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01229-5.
4
Early experience with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting with the internal thoracic artery.使用胸廓内动脉进行微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术的早期经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 May;117(5):873-80. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70366-1.
5
Rationale for off-pump coronary revascularization to small branches--angiographic study of 1,283 anastomoses in 408 patients.非体外循环冠状动脉小分支血管重建的理论依据——408例患者1283处吻合口的血管造影研究
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 May;77(5):1530-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.043.
6
Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis.单支与双侧乳内动脉移植:10年结果分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Sep;64(3):599-605. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00620-6.
7
Has the in situ right internal thoracic artery been overlooked? An angiographic study of the radial artery, internal thoracic arteries and saphenous vein graft patencies in symptomatic patients.原位右胸廓内动脉是否被忽视了?一项对有症状患者的桡动脉、胸廓内动脉和大隐静脉移植血管通畅情况的血管造影研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 May;27(5):870-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.01.027.
8
Multiple off-pump coronary revascularization with "aorta no-touch " technique using composite and sequential methods.采用复合及序贯方法的“非接触主动脉”技术的多次非体外循环冠状动脉血运重建术
Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(2):114-8.
9
Sequential venous bypass grafts: results 10 years later.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Feb;63(2):371-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(96)01059-4.
10
Long-term outcome of myocardial revascularization in patients with Kawasaki coronary artery disease. A multicenter cooperative study.川崎病冠状动脉疾病患者心肌血运重建的长期预后。一项多中心合作研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Mar;107(3):663-73; discussion 673-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The patency of graft and anastomoses in sequential and individual coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis.序贯与独立冠状动脉旁路移植术吻合口和桥血管通畅率的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2020 Oct;24(4):235-243. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.10406.
2
Perioperative observations of different bypass modes of a right coronary system based on instantaneous blood flow during the operation.基于手术过程中瞬时血流的右冠状动脉系统不同旁路模式的围手术期观察。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 14;15(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01229-5.
3
Relevance of SYNTAX score for assessment of saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting.
SYNTAX评分在评估冠状动脉旁路移植术后大隐静脉移植血管失败中的相关性
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2019 Dec 3;6(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2019.05.005. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Patency of Individual and Sequential Coronary Artery Bypass in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: A Meta-analysis.缺血性心脏病患者个体及序贯冠状动脉搭桥术的通畅率:一项荟萃分析。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug 27;34(4):420-427. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0284.
5
Management and Prevention of Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: A Review.隐静脉移植失败的管理与预防:综述
Cardiol Ther. 2017 Dec;6(2):203-223. doi: 10.1007/s40119-017-0094-6. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
6
Sequential vein bypass grafting is not associated with an increase of either in-hospital or mid-term adverse events in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.序贯静脉搭桥术与非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术中的院内或中期不良事件增加无关。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Jan 5;128(1):63-8. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.147813.
7
Coronary steal or large collateral? Three cases of graft failure in sequential and composite grafts.冠状动脉窃血还是大的侧支循环?三例序贯和复合移植血管失败病例
BMJ Case Rep. 2014 Nov 12;2014:bcr2014206932. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-206932.
8
Conduits for coronary bypass: vein grafts.冠状动脉搭桥的管道:静脉移植物。
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Oct;45(5):275-86. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2012.45.5.275. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
Saphenous vein grafts with multiple versus single distal targets in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: one-year graft failure and five-year outcomes from the Project of Ex-Vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection (PREVENT) IV trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术中使用具有多个与单个远端靶目标的隐静脉移植物:来自经转染的体外静脉移植物工程(PREVENT)IV 试验的一年移植物失败和五年结果。
Circulation. 2011 Jul 19;124(3):280-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.991299. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
10
Flow and wall shear stress in end-to-side and side-to-side anastomosis of venous coronary artery bypass grafts.静脉冠状动脉旁路移植术中端侧和侧侧吻合的血流与壁面剪应力
Biomed Eng Online. 2007 Sep 26;6:35. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-6-35.