Lee C Y, Yang P K, Tzou W S, Hwang M J
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Protein Eng. 1998 Jun;11(6):429-37. doi: 10.1093/protein/11.6.429.
Although the free energy perturbation approach is a rigorous method for estimating the relative binding free energy between an enzyme and its inhibitors, it is computationally expensive. This paper examines the accuracy at different levels of approximations, following the series expansion of free energy derived by Aqvist et al. Level-0 calculates only the enzyme-inhibitor interaction energy at the minimum energy configuration without solvent. In Level-0MD, the inhibitor configurations are sampled by molecular dynamics. These levels assume that the second- and higher order terms in the series expansion can be neglected and that the interaction energies in the bound and unbound states are equal. Level-1 does not assume equal interaction energies in the bound and unbound states. Level-1S includes the solvent contribution but both enzyme and inhibitor are fixed. In Level-1SMD, the inhibitor configurations are sampled by molecular dynamics. Level-2SMD retains the second-order term. We chose seven HIV-1 protease inhibitors for study: A77003, A76889, A76928, A78791, A74704, JG365 and MVT101. Level-0 and Level-0MD were found to give essentially the same relative interaction energies by using the AMBER force field, suggesting that fixing atomic positions may be a good approximation in some cases. However, as expected, Level-0 or Level-0MD gave poor predictions for the relative binding free energies between hydrophobic inhibitors (e.g. A77003) and more hydrophilic inhibitors (e.g. JG365). Level-1SMD produced a much better correlation between calculated and experimental results. Inclusion of the second-order term did not improve the accuracy.
尽管自由能微扰方法是一种估算酶与其抑制剂之间相对结合自由能的严谨方法,但计算成本高昂。本文按照阿奎斯特等人推导的自由能级数展开式,研究了不同近似水平下的准确性。0级仅计算在无溶剂的最低能量构型下的酶 - 抑制剂相互作用能。在0级分子动力学(Level - 0MD)中,通过分子动力学对抑制剂构型进行采样。这些水平假设级数展开中的二阶及更高阶项可忽略不计,且结合态与非结合态的相互作用能相等。1级不假设结合态与非结合态的相互作用能相等。1级溶剂模型(Level - 1S)包括溶剂贡献,但酶和抑制剂均固定。在1级分子动力学溶剂模型(Level - 1SMD)中,通过分子动力学对抑制剂构型进行采样。2级分子动力学溶剂模型(Level - 2SMD)保留二阶项。我们选择了七种HIV - 1蛋白酶抑制剂进行研究:A77003、A76889、A76928、A78791、A74704、JG365和MVT101。发现使用AMBER力场时,0级和0级分子动力学给出的相对相互作用能基本相同,这表明在某些情况下固定原子位置可能是一种良好的近似。然而,正如预期的那样,0级或0级分子动力学对疏水性抑制剂(如A77003)和亲水性更强的抑制剂(如JG365)之间的相对结合自由能预测不佳。1级分子动力学溶剂模型在计算结果与实验结果之间产生了更好的相关性。包含二阶项并没有提高准确性。