Simonds R J, Brown T M, Thea D M, Orloff S L, Steketee R W, Lee F K, Palumbo P E, Kalish M L
Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
AIDS. 1998 Aug 20;12(12):1545-9. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199812000-00018.
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of an RNA detection assay for diagnosing perinatal HIV infection.
Plasma and serum specimens taken during the first 3 months of life from HIV-infected and uninfected children enrolled in a cohort study were assayed for HIV RNA using the qualitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) kit. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. NASBA results from infected children were compared with DNA PCR results from the same blood samples. Autoantibody patterns of suspected false-positive specimens were compared with those of subsequent specimens from the same child to exclude specimen labelling errors.
Amongst 131 specimens from 105 HIV-infected children, the sensitivity of the qualitative NASBA assay was 13 out of 34 [38%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 22-56] at < 7 days, 56 out of 58 (97%; 95% CI, 88-100) at 7-41 days, and 37 out of 39 (95%; 95% CI, 83-99) at 42-93 days of life. Of 252 specimens from 206 uninfected children, six tested positive and one tested indeterminate by NASBA. Four of these positive specimens had discordant autoantibody patterns suggesting mislabelling; excluding these, the test specificity was 245 out of 248 (99%; 95% CI, 97-100). Amongst 128 paired specimens from infected children, NASBA results were more often positive than those from DNA PCR (103 versus 92; P=0.01). Amongst infants with specimens drawn in the first week of life, the proportion born after > 4 h of membrane rupture was greater amongst those testing negative (81%) than those testing positive (46%; P=0.05).
The qualitative NASBA RNA assay is highly specific and more sensitive than DNA PCR. Qualitative RNA assays may be useful for diagnosing and excluding perinatal HIV infection in children after the first week of life for such purposes as initiating antiretroviral therapy and other treatment, resolving parental uncertainty, determining timing of transmission, and providing endpoints for intervention trials.
评估一种用于诊断围产期HIV感染的RNA检测方法的敏感性和特异性。
使用基于定性核酸序列扩增(NASBA)试剂盒,对参加队列研究的HIV感染和未感染儿童出生后前3个月采集的血浆和血清标本进行HIV RNA检测。计算敏感性、特异性和预测值。将感染儿童的NASBA结果与同一血样的DNA PCR结果进行比较。将疑似假阳性标本的自身抗体模式与同一儿童后续标本的自身抗体模式进行比较,以排除标本标记错误。
在来自105名HIV感染儿童的131份标本中,定性NASBA检测的敏感性在出生<7天时为34份中的13份[38%;95%置信区间(CI),22-56],在7-41天时为58份中的56份(97%;95%CI,88-100),在42-93天时为39份中的37份(95%;95%CI,83-99)。在来自206名未感染儿童的252份标本中,6份经NASBA检测呈阳性,1份检测结果不确定。其中4份阳性标本的自身抗体模式不一致,提示标记错误;排除这些标本后,检测特异性为248份中的245份(99%;95%CI,97-100)。在来自感染儿童的128对配对标本中,NASBA结果呈阳性的情况比DNA PCR结果更常见(103对92;P=0.01)。在出生后第一周采集标本的婴儿中,胎膜破裂>4小时后出生的比例在检测阴性的婴儿中(81%)高于检测阳性的婴儿(46%;P=0.05)。
定性NASBA RNA检测具有高度特异性,且比DNA PCR更敏感。定性RNA检测对于出生后第一周后的儿童诊断和排除围产期HIV感染可能有用,可用于启动抗逆转录病毒治疗和其他治疗、消除家长疑虑、确定传播时间以及为干预试验提供终点指标等目的。