Nisman B, Barak V, Heching N, Kramer M, Reinus C, Lafair J
Oncology Department, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Cancer Detect Prev. 1998;22(5):416-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1500.1998.00053.x.
Previously available serum tumor markers had a low clinical value in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The recently developed tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and CYFRA 21-1 assays identify the soluble cytokeratin 18 and 19 fragments, respectively. In MPM these cytokeratins are expressed and may therefore be used as serum tumor markers. In this preliminary study, TPS and CYFRA 21-1 assays were evaluated to determine their potential for management of patients with MPM. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was evaluated as an additional marker. The study group consisted of 95 patients with benign lung and pleural diseases (BLPD), 14 patients with MPM, 41 patients with adenocarcinoma of lung (AC), and 40 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of lung (SQC). The utilized cutoff points corresponded to a 95% specificity for patients with BLPD. In MPM, TPS showed greater sensitivity (64.3%) than CYFRA 21-1 (50.0%), while CEA showed no sensitivity. In SQC, the marker CYFRA 21-1 had the highest sensitivity (52.5%), whereas in AC the most sensitive marker was CEA (56.1%). Significantly lower levels of CEA were found in MPM compared with BLPD (p < 0.001) or AC and SQC (p < 0.0001). Conversely, TPS levels in MPM were significantly higher than in SQC (p < 0.05). Close correlation of various individual pretreatment marker levels was observed only between TPS and CYFRA 21-1, both in MPM (r = 0.84; p < 0.001) and in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (r = 0.71; p < 0.001). In serial determinations of the markers during chemotherapy of MPM (n = 10), TPS and CYFRA 21-1 were shown to demonstrate more or less the same pattern of reactivity, although the changes in the TPS levels better reflected the clinical response to therapy. In conclusion, TPS seems to be a more sensitive marker than CYFRA 21-1.
此前可用的血清肿瘤标志物在恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)中的临床价值较低。最近开发的组织多肽特异性抗原(TPS)和细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA 21-1)检测分别可识别可溶性细胞角蛋白18和19片段。在MPM中,这些细胞角蛋白会表达,因此可用作血清肿瘤标志物。在这项初步研究中,对TPS和CYFRA 21-1检测进行了评估,以确定它们在MPM患者管理中的潜力。癌胚抗原(CEA)作为一种额外的标志物进行了评估。研究组包括95例良性肺和胸膜疾病(BLPD)患者、14例MPM患者、41例肺腺癌(AC)患者和40例肺鳞状细胞癌(SQC)患者。所采用的临界值对应于BLPD患者95%的特异性。在MPM中,TPS的敏感性(64.3%)高于CYFRA 21-1(50.0%),而CEA无敏感性。在SQC中,CYFRA 21-1标志物的敏感性最高(52.5%),而在AC中最敏感的标志物是CEA(56.1%)。与BLPD(p < 0.001)或AC和SQC(p < 0.0001)相比,MPM患者的CEA水平显著更低。相反,MPM患者的TPS水平显著高于SQC患者(p < 0.05)。仅在MPM(r = 0.84;p < 0.001)和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)(r = 0.71;p < 0.001)中观察到TPS和CYFRA 21-1这两种个体治疗前标志物水平之间存在密切相关性。在MPM化疗期间(n = 10)对标志物进行的系列测定中,尽管TPS水平的变化能更好地反映临床治疗反应,但TPS和CYFRA 21-1显示出大致相同的反应模式。总之,TPS似乎是比CYFRA 21-1更敏感的标志物。