Fernández-Ruanova M B, Alvarez F J, Gastiasoro E, Arnaiz A, Robertson B, Curstedt T, Valls-i-Soler A
Department Pediatrics, Hospital de Cruces, Basque University School of Medicine, Bilbao, Spain.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998 Aug;26(2):129-34. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199808)26:2<129::aid-ppul10>3.0.co;2-3.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of modified porcine surfactant (Curosurf) given either by a simplified slow delivery technique or by the standard bolus method, on pulmonary gas exchange, lung mechanics, and surfactant distribution in rats with respiratory failure produced by lung lavage. Twelve rats with respiratory failure induced by lung lavage received 200 mg x kg(-1) body weight (b.w.) of tagged porcine surfactant, either by the standard bolus delivery technique or by a simplified 1-min intratracheal infusion method, not requiring interruption of mechanical ventilation. Cardiovascular parameters, arterial blood gases, and pulmonary mechanics were measured repeatedly. Surfactant distribution was also measured by dye-tagged microbead spheres. After surfactant administration, there were no overall major differences between groups in mean heart rate, blood pressure, arterial blood gases, dynamic lung compliance, respiratory system resistance, and pulmonary distribution of exogenous surfactant. However, after 180 min pulmonary gas exchange was better and compliance higher in the bolus than the 1-min infusion group. A transient decrease in blood pressure and heart rate was observed in the bolus group; this side effect was not seen in animals treated with the simplified 1-min infusion method. We conclude that in rats subjected to lung lavage, the infusion of porcine surfactant by a simplified 1-min procedure produced similar short-term effects compared to the same dose of surfactant given by the bolus method. We speculate that tracheal bolus dosing is highly effective and might be the preferable delivery method for porcine surfactant. Dosing by the simplified method described appears less effective, but since no significant differences were observed, and since it produced less acute adverse effects, it could be used when clinical circumstances preclude rapid delivery.
本研究的目的是比较采用简化缓慢给药技术或标准推注法给予改良猪肺表面活性物质(珂立苏),对经肺灌洗导致呼吸衰竭的大鼠肺气体交换、肺力学及表面活性物质分布的影响。12只经肺灌洗诱发呼吸衰竭的大鼠,通过标准推注给药技术或简化的1分钟气管内输注法接受200mg·kg⁻¹体重的标记猪肺表面活性物质,无需中断机械通气。重复测量心血管参数、动脉血气和肺力学指标。还通过染料标记的微珠球测量表面活性物质分布。给予表面活性物质后,两组在平均心率、血压、动脉血气、动态肺顺应性、呼吸系统阻力及外源性表面活性物质的肺内分布方面总体无显著差异。然而,180分钟后,推注组的肺气体交换更好,顺应性更高,优于1分钟输注组。推注组观察到血压和心率短暂下降;简化1分钟输注法处理的动物未见此副作用。我们得出结论,在经肺灌洗的大鼠中,与推注法给予相同剂量的表面活性物质相比,简化的1分钟给药程序输注猪肺表面活性物质产生的短期效果相似。我们推测气管推注给药非常有效,可能是猪肺表面活性物质更可取的给药方法。所述简化方法给药似乎效果较差,但由于未观察到显著差异,且产生的急性不良反应较少,在临床情况不允许快速给药时可使用。