• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

规则学习中的发展差异:一项微观发生学分析。

Developmental differences in rule learning: a microgenetic analysis.

作者信息

Siegler R S, Chen Z

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 1998 Aug;36(3):273-310. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0686.

DOI:10.1006/cogp.1998.0686
PMID:9729904
Abstract

Trial-by-trial strategy assessments and a microgenetic design were used to examine 4- and 5-year-olds' learning of rules for solving balance scale problems. The design allowed us to examine simultaneously the contribution to rule learning of distal variables (qualities and knowledge with which children enter the learning situation) and proximal variables (processes that they execute during learning). Developmental differences in learning arose through two distal variables that were correlated with age--initial rule use and initial encoding-helping older children to execute several proximal processes--noticing the potential explanatory role of a key variable, formulating a more advanced rule, and generalizing and maintaining the rule. Joint consideration of distal and proximal influences seems likely to be generally useful for understanding learning and development.

摘要

采用逐次试验策略评估和微观发生设计来考察4岁和5岁儿童对解决天平问题规则的学习情况。该设计使我们能够同时考察远端变量(儿童进入学习情境时所具备的特质和知识)和近端变量(他们在学习过程中执行的过程)对规则学习的贡献。学习中的发展差异源于两个与年龄相关的远端变量——初始规则运用和初始编码,这有助于年龄较大的儿童执行几个近端过程,即注意到关键变量的潜在解释作用、制定更高级的规则以及概括和维持该规则。综合考虑远端和近端影响似乎对理解学习和发展通常是有用的。

相似文献

1
Developmental differences in rule learning: a microgenetic analysis.规则学习中的发展差异:一项微观发生学分析。
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Aug;36(3):273-310. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0686.
2
Across the great divide: bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers' and older children's thinking.跨越巨大差异:弥合对幼儿与大龄儿童思维理解之间的差距
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2000;65(2):i-vii, 1-96.
3
Learning to map: strategy discovery and strategy change in young children.
Dev Psychol. 2007 Mar;43(2):386-403. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.386.
4
Flankers facilitate 3-year-olds' performance in a card-sorting task.侧翼刺激有助于3岁儿童在卡片分类任务中的表现。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Jan;44(1):265-74. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.265.
5
Differentiation and integration: guiding principles for analyzing cognitive change.分化与整合:分析认知变化的指导原则
Dev Sci. 2008 Jul;11(4):433-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00689.x.
6
The effect of social engagement on 24-month-olds' imitation from live and televised models.社交参与对24个月大婴儿模仿真实和电视模型的影响。
Dev Sci. 2008 Sep;11(5):722-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00722.x.
7
How do symbols affect 3- to 4-year-olds' executive function? Evidence from a reverse-contingency task.符号如何影响3至4岁儿童的执行功能?来自反向偶发任务的证据。
Dev Sci. 2009 Nov;12(6):1070-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00856.x.
8
Evidence of developmental differences in implicit sequence learning: an fMRI study of children and adults.内隐序列学习中发育差异的证据:一项针对儿童和成人的功能磁共振成像研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Oct;16(8):1339-51. doi: 10.1162/0898929042304688.
9
Matching and naming objects by shape or function: age and context effects in preschool children.根据形状或功能匹配并命名物体:学龄前儿童的年龄及情境效应
Dev Psychol. 2002 Jul;38(4):503-18.
10
Developmental differences in understanding of balance scales in the United States and Zimbabwe.美国和津巴布韦在平衡秤理解方面的发育差异。
J Genet Psychol. 2000 Mar;161(1):5-22. doi: 10.1080/00221320009596691.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's (Mis)understanding of the Balance Beam (Online Edition).儿童对平衡木的(错误)理解(网络版)
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 23;12:702524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702524. eCollection 2021.
2
Prompting Children's Belief Revision About Balance Through Primary and Secondary Sources of Evidence.通过主要和次要证据来源促使儿童修正关于平衡的信念
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 22;11:1503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01503. eCollection 2020.
3
Inquiry-Based Learning and Conceptual Change in Balance Beam Understanding.基于探究的学习与平衡木理解中的概念转变
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 22;11:1621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01621. eCollection 2020.
4
The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children's Reasoning About Stability.建构游戏对5至6岁儿童稳定性推理能力的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1737. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01737. eCollection 2020.
5
Creativity in the Here and Now: A Generic, Micro-Developmental Measure of Creativity.当下的创造力:一种通用的、微观发展的创造力测量方法。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 8;9:2095. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02095. eCollection 2018.
6
Preschool physics: Using the invisible property of weight in causal reasoning tasks.学前物理:在因果推理任务中使用重量的不可见属性。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 21;13(3):e0192054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192054. eCollection 2018.
7
Explanation-based learning in infancy.婴儿期的基于解释的学习。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1511-1526. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1334-4.
8
Young children discover how to deceive in 10 days: a microgenetic study.幼儿在 10 天内学会如何欺骗:一项微观发生研究。
Dev Sci. 2018 May;21(3):e12566. doi: 10.1111/desc.12566. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
9
The Effect of Feedback and Operational Experience on Children's Rule Learning.反馈与操作经验对儿童规则学习的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 13;8:534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00534. eCollection 2017.
10
Visual relations children find easy and difficult to process in figural analogies.儿童在图形类比中容易和难以处理的视觉关系。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 5;5:827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00827. eCollection 2014.