• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗病态肥胖的可调节硅胶胃束带术与垂直带状胃成形术对比

Stoma adjustable silicone gastric banding versus vertical banded gastroplasty for the treatment of morbid obesity.

作者信息

Taşkin M, Apaydin B B, Zengin K, Taşkin U

机构信息

Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, General Surgery Department, Turkey.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 1997 Oct;7(5):424-8. doi: 10.1381/096089297765555412.

DOI:10.1381/096089297765555412
PMID:9730497
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among gastric restrictive operations, the procedure of choice is still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the results of two different gastric restrictive procedures: vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and stoma adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB).

METHODS

Between 1991 and 1996, 51 patients were treated surgically for morbid obesity: 27 underwent VBG and 24 underwent ASGB. Preoperative body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI) and percentage of ideal body weight (% IBW) were (mean+/-SD): 145.7+/-45.3 kg; 53.9+/-15.9 kg/m2; 249.1+/-73.5% respectively in the VBG group. Corresponding figures for the ASBG group were 132.5+/-22.7 kg; 46.9 7.8 kg/m2 and 207.2+/-35.0%.

RESULTS

In the VBG group, the median follow-up period was 26 months (range: 7-47). Eighteen months after the operation BW, BMI, % IBW and percentage of excess weight loss (% EWL) were 85.5+/-26.8 kg, 31.9+/-9.8 kg/m2, 145.4+/-43.9% and 74+/-1% respectively. Complications included incisional hernia (n=1), and bowel obstruction (n=1). One patient died of acute myocardial infarction on the third postoperative day. In the ASGB group, median follow-up time was 19.7 months (range: 18-26). At 18 months postoperation BW, BMI, % IBW and % EWL values were 86.6+/-20.6 kg 30.6+/-6.6 kg/m2 140.6+/-29.3% and 64+/-1% respectively. Gastric wall erosion occurred in two patients and the bands had to be removed. These patients underwent VBG 6 months later. Complications encountered in this group were incisional hernia (n=1), outlet stenosis and reflux esophagitis (n=1), reservoir leakage (n=1) and gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1). Two patients died of pulmonary embolism and acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight reduction was not statistically significant between the two groups. ASGB was easier to perform and less invasive than VBG.

摘要

背景

在胃限制性手术中,首选的手术方式仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较两种不同胃限制性手术的结果:垂直捆扎胃成形术(VBG)和可调节硅胶胃束带术(ASGB)。

方法

1991年至1996年间,51例患者接受了肥胖症手术治疗:27例行VBG,24例行ASGB。术前体重(BW)、体重指数(BMI)和理想体重百分比(%IBW)(均值±标准差)在VBG组分别为:145.7±45.3kg;53.9±15.9kg/m²;249.1±73.5%。ASBG组的相应数据为132.5±22.7kg;46.9±7.8kg/m²和207.2±35.0%。

结果

在VBG组,中位随访期为26个月(范围:7 - 47个月)。术后18个月,BW、BMI、%IBW和超重减轻百分比(%EWL)分别为85.5±26.8kg、31.9±9.8kg/m²、145.4±43.9%和74±1%。并发症包括切口疝(n = 1)和肠梗阻(n = 1)。一名患者在术后第三天死于急性心肌梗死。在ASGB组,中位随访时间为19.7个月(范围:18 - 26个月)。术后18个月,BW、BMI、%IBW和%EWL值分别为86.6±20.6kg、30.6±6.6kg/m²、140.6±29.3%和64±1%。两名患者发生胃壁糜烂,束带不得不移除。这两名患者在6个月后接受了VBG。该组遇到的并发症有切口疝(n = 1)、出口狭窄和反流性食管炎(n = 1)、贮器渗漏(n = 1)和胃肠道出血(n = 1)。两名患者死于肺栓塞和急性胃肠道出血。

结论

两组之间体重减轻无统计学显著差异。ASGB比VBG更容易实施且侵入性更小。

相似文献

1
Stoma adjustable silicone gastric banding versus vertical banded gastroplasty for the treatment of morbid obesity.用于治疗病态肥胖的可调节硅胶胃束带术与垂直带状胃成形术对比
Obes Surg. 1997 Oct;7(5):424-8. doi: 10.1381/096089297765555412.
2
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus open vertical banded gastroplasty: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术与开放垂直带环胃成形术:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Obes Surg. 2005 Oct;15(9):1292-8. doi: 10.1381/096089205774512456.
3
A prospective comparison of vertical banded gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a non-superobese population.非超级肥胖人群中垂直束带胃成形术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的前瞻性比较。
Obes Surg. 2006 Feb;16(2):151-8. doi: 10.1381/096089206775565096.
4
Vertical banded gastroplasty versus adjustable gastric banding: prospective long-term follow-up study.垂直捆绑胃成形术与可调节胃束带术:前瞻性长期随访研究
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Jan-Feb;3(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
5
Early results of laparoscopic gastric banding compared with open vertical banded gastroplasty.腹腔镜胃束带术与开放式垂直束带胃成形术的早期结果比较。
Obes Surg. 1999 Aug;9(4):374-80. doi: 10.1381/096089299765552963.
6
Laparoscopic conversion of adjustable gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty to duodenal switch.腹腔镜可调胃束带术和垂直捆绑胃成形术转为十二指肠转流术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Nov-Dec;5(6):678-83. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
7
Vertical banded gastroplasty: long-term results comparing three different techniques.垂直束带胃成形术:三种不同技术的长期结果比较
Obes Surg. 2000 Feb;10(1):41-6; discussion 47. doi: 10.1381/09608920060674094.
8
Vertical banded gastroplasty: 6 years experience at a center in Poland.垂直束带胃成形术:波兰一家中心的6年经验
Obes Surg. 2005 Feb;15(2):223-7. doi: 10.1381/0960892053268390.
9
Vertical banded gastroplasty-gastric bypass in Mexican patients with severe obesity: 1 year experience.墨西哥严重肥胖患者的垂直束带胃成形术-胃旁路手术:1年经验
Obes Surg. 1997 Aug;7(4):322-5. doi: 10.1381/096089297765555557.
10
[Restrictive procedures in the treatment of morbid obesity -- vertical banded gastroplasty vs. adjustable gastric banding].[病态肥胖治疗中的限制性手术——垂直捆绑胃成形术与可调节胃束带术]
Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Dec;127(12):1038-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36376.

引用本文的文献

1
The importance of a travel history in the preoperative assessment of an elective surgical patient.旅行史在择期手术患者术前评估中的重要性。
BMJ Case Rep. 2011 Nov 8;2011:bcr0720114564. doi: 10.1136/bcr.07.2011.4564.
2
Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).肥胖症手术:欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)基于证据的指南。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):200-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9194-1. Epub 2004 Dec 2.