Feuerstein G Z, Wang X, Barone F C
Department of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pa., USA.
Neuroimmunomodulation. 1998 May-Aug;5(3-4):143-59. doi: 10.1159/000026331.
Accumulating evidence during the last decade has shown that the CNS can mount a well-defined inflammatory reaction to a variety of insults including trauma, ischemia, transplantation, viral infections as well as neurodegeneration. Many aspects of this centrally derived inflammatory response parallel to some extent the nature of such a reaction in the periphery. Through the recent application of molecular genetic techniques including PCR, utilization of cDNA probes in conjuncture with the availability of highly specific antibodies, new concepts are rapidly emerging as to the molecular mechanisms associated with the development of brain injury. In particular, the importance of cytokines, especially TNFalpha and IL-1beta, is emphasized in the propagation and maintenance of a CNS inflammatory response. This review summarizes evidence in support of a case for ischemia and trauma eliciting an inflammatory condition in the injured brain. The inflammatory condition consists of cells (neutrophils early after the onset of brain injury and subsequently monocyte infiltration) and mediators (cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules). It is clear that de novo up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecules in the brain occurs soon following focal ischemia and trauma and at a time when the tissue injury is evolving. The significance of the inflammatory response and its contribution to brain injury are now becoming better understood. Evidence has emerged in support of the role of cytokines in driving the inflammatory response and that this process is causally related to the degree of brain injury. Evidence reviewed includes: (1) the capacity of specific cytokines to exacerbate brain damage; (2) the capacity of specific cytokine blockade to reduce ischemic brain damage; (3) depletion of circulating neutrophils reduces ischemic brain injury, and (4) antagonists of the endothelial-leukocyte adhesion interactions (e.g. anti-ICAM-1) reduce ischemic brain injury. Targeting the cytokines that drive the brain inflammatory response to injury provides opportunities to intervene with novel therapeutics in stroke and neurotrauma.
在过去十年中,越来越多的证据表明,中枢神经系统(CNS)能够对包括创伤、缺血、移植、病毒感染以及神经退行性变在内的多种损伤产生明确的炎症反应。这种源自中枢的炎症反应在许多方面在一定程度上与外周的此类反应性质相似。通过最近应用包括聚合酶链反应(PCR)在内的分子遗传学技术,结合cDNA探针的使用以及高特异性抗体的可得性,关于与脑损伤发展相关的分子机制的新观念正在迅速涌现。特别是,细胞因子,尤其是肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)和白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β),在中枢神经系统炎症反应的传播和维持中的重要性得到了强调。本综述总结了支持缺血和创伤在损伤脑中引发炎症状态这一观点的证据。炎症状态由细胞(脑损伤发作后早期的中性粒细胞以及随后的单核细胞浸润)和介质(细胞因子、趋化因子和黏附分子)组成。很明显,在局灶性缺血和创伤后不久,也就是组织损伤正在发展的时候,脑中促炎细胞因子、趋化因子和内皮细胞-白细胞黏附分子会从头上调。炎症反应的重要性及其对脑损伤的贡献现在正被更好地理解。已经出现证据支持细胞因子在驱动炎症反应中的作用,并且这个过程与脑损伤程度存在因果关系。所综述的证据包括:(1)特定细胞因子加剧脑损伤的能力;(2)特定细胞因子阻断减少缺血性脑损伤的能力;(3)循环中性粒细胞的耗竭减少缺血性脑损伤,以及(4)内皮细胞-白细胞黏附相互作用的拮抗剂(例如抗细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1))减少缺血性脑损伤。针对驱动脑对损伤炎症反应的细胞因子提供了用新型疗法干预中风和神经创伤的机会。