Clark S A, Wilson C R, Satoh M, Pegelow D, Dempsey J A
John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Sep;158(3):713-22. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.3.9708056.
To define the standard of airway flow limitation, pharyngeal pressure and flow rate were measured during wakefulness and sleep in seven habitual snorers with widely varying degrees of sleep-induced increases in upper airway resistance. Inspiratory pressure:flow relationships were used to group breaths into four categories of flow limitation, including linear (Level 1), mildly alinear (Level 2), constant flow rate with no pressure dependence (Level 3), and decreasing flow rate throughout significant portions of inspiration, i.e., negative pressure dependence (Level 4). These pressure:flow rate gold standards of flow limitation were used to evaluate a flow limitation index derived from the time profile (or "shape") of three noninvasive estimates of flow rate: (1) pneumotach flow rate, (2) differentiated sum respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP), and (3) nasal pressure. A nonflow limited template for each of these noninvasive measurements was taken from awake breaths and the difference in area determined between the template breath and each of the noninvasive signals measured during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. The noninvasive flow limitation indices were found to be effective in differentiating severe types of inspiratory flow limitation, i.e., Level 1 versus Level 3 or Level 4 (sensitivity/specificity > 80%). On the other hand, these indirect indices were not able to consistently detect mild levels of flow limitation (Level 1 versus Level 2; sensitivity/specificity = 62 to 72%); nor were these noninvasive estimates of flow rate "shape" sensitive to breaths with a high but fixed resistance throughout inspiration. The area index derived from measurements of pressure at the nares (Pn) was the most sensitive, nonperturbing, noninvasive measure of flow rate and flow limitation, and we recommend its use for recognizing most of the common types of moderate to severe levels of airway flow limitation in sleeping subjects.
为了定义气道气流受限的标准,我们对7名习惯性打鼾者在清醒和睡眠期间的咽部压力和流速进行了测量,这些打鼾者睡眠引起的上气道阻力增加程度差异很大。吸气压力与流速的关系被用于将呼吸分为四类气流受限,包括线性(1级)、轻度非线性(2级)、无压力依赖性的恒定流速(3级)以及在吸气的大部分时间内流速降低,即负压依赖性(4级)。这些气流受限的压力与流速金标准被用于评估从三种非侵入性流速估计值的时间曲线(或“形状”)得出的气流受限指数:(1)呼吸流速仪流速,(2)差分和呼吸感应体积描记法(RIP),以及(3)鼻腔压力。从清醒呼吸中获取每种非侵入性测量的非气流受限模板,并确定模板呼吸与非快速眼动(NREM)睡眠期间测量的每个非侵入性信号之间的面积差异。发现非侵入性气流受限指数在区分严重类型的吸气气流受限方面有效,即1级与3级或4级(敏感性/特异性>80%)。另一方面,这些间接指数不能一致地检测到轻度气流受限水平(1级与2级;敏感性/特异性=62%至72%);这些流速“形状”的非侵入性估计对整个吸气过程中具有高但固定阻力的呼吸也不敏感。从鼻内压力(Pn)测量得出的面积指数是最敏感、无干扰、非侵入性的流速和气流受限测量方法,我们建议使用它来识别睡眠受试者中大多数常见类型的中度至重度气道气流受限。