Suppr超能文献

用激光多普勒血流仪监测西替利嗪和依巴斯汀对组胺离子导入皮肤反应的影响比较。

Comparison of the effects of cetirizine and ebastine on the skin response to histamine iontophoresis monitored with laser Doppler flowmetry.

作者信息

Leroy T, Tasset C, Valentin B, Van Neste D

机构信息

Skin Study Center, Skinterface, Tournai, Belgium.

出版信息

Dermatology. 1998;197(2):146-51. doi: 10.1159/000017987.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The administration of histamine with iontophoresis is an alternative method to skin prick tests or intradermal injections. Skin reactions obtained with this method can be recorded with laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and previous studies with this method have shown histamine-induced laser Doppler changes in the wheal area.

OBJECTIVE

In order to compare the influence of two H1 receptor antagonists (cetirizine 10 mg vs. ebastine 10 mg) on the skin vascular responses to histamine introduced by iontophoresis, we designed a double-blind, randomized, two-period crossover trial in which 18 volunteers were randomized.

METHODS

Before and 2, 5 and 7 h after drug administration, iontophoresis (30 s, 1.4 mA/cm2) of histamine 10% was performed and followed by (1) monitoring of skin vascular responses with LDF at the administration site and at 1 cm from it, and (2) wheal and flare area measurements.

RESULTS

2, 5 and 7 h after intake of the antihistaminic drug, there were significant differences between both drugs. Concerning LDF recordings, we noted at the histamine administration site an increase in perfusion unit (PU) values which is an effect known to be in proportion to the degree of inhibition of wheal reaction, and at 1 cm distal to the histamine administration site, there was a decrease in PU values. These changes were more marked under cetirizine. A greater suppressive effect of cetirizine on the wheal and flare reaction was consistently observed at all time points during the study, demonstrating its superior efficacy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that (1) cetirizine demonstrated a stronger antihistaminic effect compared to ebastine at all time points; (2) iontophoresis appears to be an appropriate method to study specific microvascular changes at the delivery site of histamine and hence to detect the earliest changes occurring at the site of agonist-antagonist competition in the skin.

摘要

背景

通过离子导入法给予组胺是皮肤点刺试验或皮内注射的一种替代方法。用这种方法获得的皮肤反应可用激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)记录,此前用这种方法进行的研究已显示组胺引起的风团区域激光多普勒变化。

目的

为比较两种H1受体拮抗剂(10毫克西替利嗪与10毫克依巴斯汀)对离子导入法引入的组胺引起的皮肤血管反应的影响,我们设计了一项双盲、随机、两阶段交叉试验,18名志愿者参与随机分组。

方法

在给药前以及给药后2、5和7小时,进行10%组胺的离子导入(30秒,1.4毫安/平方厘米),随后(1)用LDF在给药部位及其1厘米处监测皮肤血管反应,(2)测量风团和红晕面积。

结果

服用抗组胺药后2、5和7小时,两种药物之间存在显著差异。关于LDF记录,我们发现在组胺给药部位灌注单位(PU)值增加,这一效应已知与风团反应的抑制程度成比例,而在组胺给药部位远端1厘米处,PU值下降。这些变化在西替利嗪作用下更为明显。在研究的所有时间点,均持续观察到西替利嗪对风团和红晕反应的抑制作用更强,表明其疗效更佳。

结论

我们得出结论:(1)在所有时间点,西替利嗪的抗组胺作用均比依巴斯汀更强;(2)离子导入法似乎是研究组胺给药部位特定微血管变化的合适方法,从而能够检测皮肤中激动剂 - 拮抗剂竞争部位最早出现的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验