Suppr超能文献

使用碘海醇定量评估血液透析清除率及残余肾功能:技术说明

Use of iohexol to quantify hemodialysis delivered and residual renal function: technical note.

作者信息

Sacamay T E, Bolton W K

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, USA.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 1998 Sep;54(3):986-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00060.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Classically, urea (molecular wt = 60) is used to determine the urea reduction ratio (URR) or clearance, based on volume of distribution (Kt/V). These methods are subject to many errors. The purpose of this study was to determine whether iohexol (Io; molecular wt = 821) could be used instead of urea and provide better information as well as middle molecule clearance data.

METHODS

Ten hemodialysis (HD) patients were evaluated. All were dialyzed for three hours, and a single bolus of 100 ml of Io was injected immediately post-HD. For direct dialysis quantification (DDQ), the spent dialysate was collected in a drum, and urea and iodine (I) determined immediately prior to, at the end of, and 30 minutes post-HD. As routinely used, DDQ measures clearance directly rather than estimates the levels.

RESULTS

Calculated Kt/V urea (1.21+/-0.05) significantly overestimated DDQ Kt/V urea (0.78+/-0.04, P < 0.001) whereas calculated and DDQ Kt/V Io were similar (1.44+/-0.10 vs. 1.36+/-0.05). The URR and iohexol reduction ratio (IoRR) were also different (0.63+/-0.02 vs. 0.69+/-0.02; P < 0.002) with a urea but not Io rebound (URR30 min 0.59+/-0.02, P < 0.05). Calculated urea clearance (C(urea)), 247+/-21 ml/min, significantly overestimated DDQ C(urea) (157+/-10 ml/min P < 0.001). Calculated CIo and DDQ CIo, however, were similar (109+/-8 vs. 104+/-7 ml/min). Total body clearance (TBC) in six anuric subjects was 2.5+/-0.3 ml/min, and in four oliguric subjects was 5.2+/-0.5 ml/min. In 10 additional patients, direct urine measurements demonstrated a non-renal clearance (NRC) of 2.97+/-0.18 ml/min, which was 4.0+/-0.3% of body wt. Use of this factor allowed an estimation of residual renal function (RRF) that accurately reflected measured RRF (1.32+/-0.53 vs. 1.42+/-0.55 ml/min)

CONCLUSION

A single injection of Io can be used to determine Kt/V, RR, and RRF without rebound or the inconvenience of urine collection. It may also represent middle molecule clearance better than urea kinetics, and may serve as a superior method for determining HD delivered and dialysis adequacy.

摘要

背景

传统上,尿素(分子量 = 60)用于根据分布容积(Kt/V)来测定尿素清除率(URR)或清除量。这些方法存在许多误差。本研究的目的是确定碘海醇(Io;分子量 = 821)是否可替代尿素使用,并能提供更好的信息以及中分子清除数据。

方法

对10名血液透析(HD)患者进行评估。所有患者均透析3小时,并在透析结束后立即静脉注射100 ml的碘海醇。为进行直接透析定量(DDQ),将用过的透析液收集到桶中,并在透析前、结束时和结束后30分钟立即测定尿素和碘(I)。按照常规使用方法,DDQ直接测量清除率而非估算水平。

结果

计算得出的Kt/V尿素(1.21±0.05)显著高估了DDQ的Kt/V尿素(0.78±0.04,P < 0.001),而计算得出的和DDQ的Kt/V碘海醇相似(1.44±0.10对1.36±0.05)。URR和碘海醇清除率(IoRR)也有所不同(0.63±0.02对0.69±0.02;P < 0.002),存在尿素但不存在碘海醇的反跳现象(URR30分钟为0.59±0.02,P < 0.05)。计算得出的尿素清除率(C(尿素))为247±21 ml/分钟,显著高估了DDQ的C(尿素)(157±10 ml/分钟,P < 0.001)。然而,计算得出的CIo和DDQ的CIo相似(109±8对104±7 ml/分钟)。6名无尿患者的全身清除率(TBC)为2.5±0.3 ml/分钟,4名少尿患者的为5.2±0.5 ml/分钟。在另外10名患者中,直接尿液测量显示非肾清除率(NRC)为2.97±0.18 ml/分钟,占体重的4.0±0.3%。使用该因素可估算残余肾功能(RRF),其准确反映了测量的RRF(1.32±0.53对1.42±0.55 ml/分钟)

结论

单次注射碘海醇可用于测定Kt/V、RR和RRF,不存在反跳现象或尿液收集的不便。它可能比尿素动力学更能代表中分子清除情况,并且可能是确定HD剂量和透析充分性的更优方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验