• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射科医生之间会诊的价值。

The value of consultation among radiologists.

作者信息

Hillman B J, Swensson R G, Hessel S J, Gerson D E, Herman P G

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976 Nov;127(5):807-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.127.5.807.

DOI:10.2214/ajr.127.5.807
PMID:973668
Abstract

The value of group consultation in improving the accuracy of radiologic diagnosis was assessed. Abnormalities on 24 films were pointed out to six groups of three radiologists each. They were asked to reach a specific diagnosis for each case. Accuracy was compared in three settingss: (1) without consultation; (2) with consultation leading to a diagnosis by group consensus; and (3) with consultation followed by independent diagnoses. The accuracy of over 75% of the radiologist improved after consultation in either setting. The extent of improvement was inversely related to the initial accuracy level of the individual. When two or three radiologists agreed initially, they were more frequently correct than not. Group discussion followed by individual diagnosis is a practical approach to radiologic consultation.

摘要

评估了小组会诊在提高放射学诊断准确性方面的价值。向六组放射科医生(每组三人)指出了24张胶片上的异常情况。要求他们对每个病例做出明确诊断。在三种情况下比较了准确性:(1)无会诊;(2)会诊后通过小组共识得出诊断;(3)会诊后进行独立诊断。在任何一种情况下,超过75%的放射科医生会诊后的准确性都有所提高。提高的程度与个体最初的准确性水平呈负相关。当最初有两三位放射科医生意见一致时,他们的判断更常是正确的。先进行小组讨论然后进行个体诊断是放射学会诊的一种实用方法。

相似文献

1
The value of consultation among radiologists.放射科医生之间会诊的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976 Nov;127(5):807-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.127.5.807.
2
How should radiologists reply when patients ask about their diagnoses? A survey of radiologists' and clinicians' preferences.当患者询问诊断结果时,放射科医生应如何回应?一项关于放射科医生和临床医生偏好的调查。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Aug;161(2):433-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.2.8333389.
3
Error review: can this improve reporting performance?错误审查:这能否提高报告性能?
Clin Radiol. 2001 Sep;56(9):751-4. doi: 10.1053/crad.2001.0760.
4
[Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].[北莱茵-威斯特法伦州门诊影像检查的质量控制,第二部分]
Rofo. 2003 Mar;175(3):346-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37823.
5
A retrospective analysis of referral patterns for oral radiologic consultation over 3 years in Ontario, Canada.对加拿大安大略省3年口腔放射学咨询转诊模式的回顾性分析。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Feb;109(2):e86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.004.
6
Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultation in small hospitals: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 18,532 frozen section consultation diagnoses in 233 small hospitals.小医院冰冻切片会诊的机构间比较:美国病理学家学会对233家小医院18532例冰冻切片会诊诊断的Q-Probes研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Dec;120(12):1087-93.
7
Relationships between radiologists and clinicians: results from three surveys.放射科医生与临床医生之间的关系:三项调查结果
Clin Radiol. 2000 Aug;55(8):602-5. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0495.
8
Errors in the MRI evaluation of musculoskeletal tumors and tumorlike lesions.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jun;459:28-33. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180485681.
9
Improving diagnostic accuracy: a comparison of interactive and Delphi consultations.
Invest Radiol. 1977 Mar-Apr;12(2):112-5. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197703000-00002.
10
Added value of radiologist consultation to family practitioners in the outpatient setting.
Radiology. 1995 Dec;197(3):759-62. doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480752.

引用本文的文献

1
Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: should the process continue?住院医生对CT检查的夜间初步解读:这个流程是否应该继续?
Emerg Radiol. 2006 Oct;13(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/s10140-006-0498-4. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
2
Clinical consequences of misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents.值班放射科住院医师对神经放射CT扫描解读错误的临床后果。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Jan;21(1):124-9.