Adamson S R
Mammalian and Microbial Cell Sciences and Pilot Operations, Genetics Institute, Andover, MA 01824, USA.
Dev Biol Stand. 1998;93:89-96.
Garnick and coworkers indicated that they experienced two independent MVM outbreaks in a period where approximately 2000 fermentations were performed, hypothesizing that such events were rare but inevitable consequences of very large scale operations. In GIs experience over the last 12 years we have seen no incidence of MVM (or any other virus) in close to 3000 fermentations, albeit at lower volumes than produced at Genentech; GI has used 250-2500L bioreactors for manufacturing whereas Genentech have reported using 100-10,000L bioreactors. Nonetheless, volumes of complex media in the same range as used at Genentech have been used at GI with no observations of viral contamination events. The reason for this is not clear. However, GI's experience in combination with experience from sub-contract testing agencies who service the majority of the biotechnology industry may call the inevitability of an MVM outbreak into question. It would appear that very few adventitious viral contaminations of cell cultures have occurred in industry in the last decade. Interestingly, the frequency of contamination events appear to be lower in CHO cells than in hybridoma cells. It should be noted, however, that these conclusions are not statistically based and the scope of the above survey was somewhat limited. RVLPs are present in both CHO and hybridoma cells. The characteristics of both are compared in Table 4. C-type particles from hybridoma cells are more abundant as a rule than those from CHO cells. Although the majority of C-type particles produced by hybridoma cells appear to be non-infective (in S+L- assays), approximately one in a million particles are competent to replicate in S+L- cells. The evidence that C-type particles can replicate in human cells has proved difficult to reproduce consistently. It is likely that replication of xenotropic hybridoma C-type particles in human cells is inefficient or restricted to only a small number of specific cell lines. C-type RVLPs from CHO cells are produced less abundantly than those from hybridoma cells and are not competent to replicate due to a defective endonuclease gene. However, over the last two decades the use of hybridoma cells and products derived from these cells has not provided any evidence of transmission of these viruses to humans; in addition they can be readily removed or inactivated. Thus, neither agent would appear to constitute a significant risk to pharmaceutical products made from their respective host cells. Nonetheless, given the difference in relative safety profiles between RVLPs from CHO and hybridoma cells it is not unreasonable to propose that safety factors (clearance factors in removal/inactivation studies in excess of the reduction of virus loads to zero) required should be less for a CHO process than for a hybridoma process.
加尼克及其同事指出,在进行了约2000次发酵的时间段内,他们经历了两起独立的鼠细小病毒(MVM)爆发事件,并推测此类事件虽罕见,但却是大规模操作不可避免的后果。在基因免疫(GI)过去12年的经验中,在近3000次发酵中未出现MVM(或任何其他病毒)感染情况,尽管其发酵规模低于基因泰克公司;GI使用250 - 2500升的生物反应器进行生产,而基因泰克公司报告使用的是100 - 10000升的生物反应器。尽管如此,GI使用的复杂培养基体积与基因泰克公司相同,却未观察到病毒污染事件。原因尚不清楚。然而,GI的经验以及为大多数生物技术行业提供服务的分包检测机构的经验,可能会让人对MVM爆发的必然性产生质疑。在过去十年中,工业界细胞培养中似乎很少发生偶然的病毒污染事件。有趣的是,中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞的污染事件频率似乎低于杂交瘤细胞。然而,应该指出的是,这些结论并非基于统计学,且上述调查的范围也有一定局限性。逆转录病毒样颗粒(RVP)存在于CHO细胞和杂交瘤细胞中。两者的特征在表4中进行了比较。通常,杂交瘤细胞产生的C型颗粒比CHO细胞产生的更丰富。尽管杂交瘤细胞产生的大多数C型颗粒在S + L - 检测中似乎无感染性,但大约每百万个颗粒中有一个能够在S + L - 细胞中复制。C型颗粒能够在人类细胞中复制的证据一直难以持续重现。异嗜性杂交瘤C型颗粒在人类细胞中的复制可能效率低下,或者仅限于少数特定细胞系。CHO细胞产生的C型RVP不如杂交瘤细胞产生的丰富,并且由于内切核酸酶基因缺陷而无法复制。然而,在过去二十年中,使用杂交瘤细胞及其衍生产品并未提供这些病毒传播给人类的任何证据;此外,它们可以很容易地被去除或灭活。因此,这两种病原体似乎都不会对由其各自宿主细胞制成的药品构成重大风险。尽管如此,鉴于CHO细胞和杂交瘤细胞的RVP相对安全性存在差异,提出CHO工艺所需的安全因子(去除/灭活研究中的清除因子超过将病毒载量降低至零)应低于杂交瘤工艺,这并非不合理。