Ohtsuka Y
Department of Child Neurology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan.
Epilepsia. 1998;39 Suppl 5:30-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb05147.x.
The purpose of this project was to study the relationship between West syndrome (WS) and its related epileptic syndromes, and reconsider the nosological limits of WS. The electroclinical features of 45 patients who experienced spasms in series were investigated, as well as some features not common in patients with WS. All patients were mentally retarded. The patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 consisted of 12 patients with refractory epilepsies with onset in early infancy, group 2 consisted of 5 patients with symptomatic localization-related epilepsies associated with spasms in series, and group 3 consisted of 28 patients with generalized epilepsies who had spasms in series after age 2 years. Partial seizures were the dominant symptom throughout the clinical course and spasms in series associated with atypical hypsarrhythmia appeared transiently during infancy in a significant number of the patients in group 1. In group 2, complex partial seizures (CPS) were the main seizure type and hypsarrhythmia was not observed during the clinical course. The EEGs in group 3 patients showed diffuse slow spike-waves or multifocal epileptic discharges in all but 1 patient. The EEG of the remaining patient still showed hypsarrhythmia at age 8 years. Therefore, group 1 patients should be classified as having WS although cortical mechanisms play a critical role in the occurrence of their seizures. Group 2 patients should be considered as having a type of localization-related epilepsy even though they share a similar pathophysiological mechanism with group 1. In group 3, 1 patient whose EEG still showed hypsarrhythmia was classified as having WS. The other patients should be classified as having generalized epilepsies other than WS.
本项目旨在研究韦斯特综合征(WS)与其相关癫痫综合征之间的关系,并重新审视WS的疾病分类界限。对45例有系列痉挛发作的患者的电临床特征进行了研究,以及一些WS患者不常见的特征。所有患者均有智力发育迟缓。患者被分为三组:第1组由12例婴儿早期起病的难治性癫痫患者组成,第2组由5例与系列痉挛相关的症状性局灶性癫痫患者组成,第3组由28例2岁后出现系列痉挛的全身性癫痫患者组成。部分性发作是整个临床过程中的主要症状,第1组中相当一部分患者在婴儿期出现与不典型高峰失律相关的系列痉挛。在第2组中,复杂部分性发作(CPS)是主要发作类型,临床过程中未观察到高峰失律。第3组患者的脑电图除1例患者外均显示弥漫性慢棘波或多灶性癫痫样放电。其余1例患者在8岁时脑电图仍显示高峰失律。因此,第1组患者应归类为患有WS,尽管皮质机制在其癫痫发作的发生中起关键作用。第2组患者应被视为患有某种类型的局灶性癫痫,即使他们与第1组有相似的病理生理机制。在第3组中,1例脑电图仍显示高峰失律的患者被归类为患有WS。其他患者应归类为患有除WS以外的全身性癫痫。