Culham T L, Savard G K
School of Physical Health Education at Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Can J Appl Physiol. 1998 Oct;23(5):444-55. doi: 10.1139/h98-027.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the positive correlation between carotid-cardiac baroreflex responsiveness and aerobic capacity (VO(2)max) that has been reported in men also occurs in women. Carotid-cardiac baroreflex responsiveness was tested in 40 healthy, normotensive women (age 18-35) using the variable neck pressure technique. Participants were subdivided into endurance-trained (ET; n = 11) and untrained (UT; n = 9) groups. No significant between-group difference was found in the range or gain of the carotid-cardiac baroreflex response despite a lower resting HR in the ET group. When participants were subdivided into high (HI; n = 13) and low (LO; n = 17) responders based on reflex RRI responses to CTP changes, no significant between-group differences were found in resting HR or VO(2)max levels. It was concluded that aerobic capacity (VO(2)max) is not a good predictor of cardiac-carotid baroreflex responsiveness in healthy women.
本研究的目的是确定男性中已报道的颈动脉-心脏压力反射反应性与有氧能力(最大摄氧量,VO₂max)之间的正相关在女性中是否也存在。采用可变颈部压力技术对40名健康、血压正常的女性(年龄18 - 35岁)进行了颈动脉-心脏压力反射反应性测试。参与者被分为耐力训练组(ET;n = 11)和未训练组(UT;n = 9)。尽管ET组静息心率较低,但在颈动脉-心脏压力反射反应的范围或增益方面未发现组间显著差异。当根据对颈总动脉压力变化的反射性RRI反应将参与者分为高反应者(HI;n = 13)和低反应者(LO;n = 17)时,在静息心率或VO₂max水平方面未发现组间显著差异。研究得出结论,在健康女性中,有氧能力(VO₂max)不是心脏-颈动脉压力反射反应性的良好预测指标。