Mohan D S, Samuels M A, Selim M A, Shalodi A D, Ellis R J, Samuels J R, Yun H J
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Aug;70(2):165-71. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5098.
The treatment of patients with stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma is often shorter and less expensive if total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), and therapeutic lymphadenectomy are used rather than TAH, BSO, pelvic lymph node sampling, and pelvic external beam radiation. We studied whether the survival and morbidity of patients treated with therapeutic lymphadenectomy are equal to or better than with these alternative treatments.
We reviewed the medical records of patients with stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma who were enrolled in the MetroHealth Medical Center tumor registry between 1970 and 1993 after undergoing full pelvic lymph node dissection, in addition to total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and vaginal brachytherapy. The mean number of resected nodes was 33 (median, 31; interquartile range, 19). Patients were followed for 1. 6-20 years (median, 8 years; interquartile range, 5.8 years). Morbidity and survival rates were compared to published series using similar treatment strategies and to those from studies using pelvic external beam radiation and pelvic lymph node sampling rather than lymphadenectomy.
Of 192 patients with pathologic stage I (FIGO 1988) endometrial adenocarcinoma, 178 patients had full pelvic lymph node dissection; 159 patients were evaluable. The 15-year overall survival was 98%; 10- and 15- year disease-free survivals were 96 and 94%, respectively. Overall morbidity was 18% (29/159), and moderate-to-severe morbidity was 13% (21/159). Recurrences were seen in 4.4% (7/159) of patients. Grade and myometrial invasion were not significant predictors of disease-free survival after full pelvic lymph node dissection (grade, P = 0.42; stage, P = 0.67). The results compare favorably with those of similar studies and with studies of pelvic external beam radiation.
Primary surgical management with total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, therapeutic pelvic lymphadenectomy, and vaginal brachytherapy is a viable and possibly preferable option for patients with stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma.
对于I期子宫内膜腺癌患者,如果采用全腹子宫切除术(TAH)、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术(BSO)和治疗性淋巴结清扫术,而非TAH、BSO、盆腔淋巴结取样和盆腔外照射放疗,其治疗时间通常更短且费用更低。我们研究了接受治疗性淋巴结清扫术的患者的生存率和发病率是否等同于或优于这些替代治疗方法。
我们回顾了1970年至1993年间在梅特罗健康医疗中心肿瘤登记处登记的I期子宫内膜腺癌患者的病历,这些患者除接受全腹子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术和阴道近距离放疗外,还接受了全盆腔淋巴结清扫术。切除淋巴结的平均数量为33个(中位数为31个;四分位间距为19个)。对患者进行了1.6至20年的随访(中位数为8年;四分位间距为5.8年)。将发病率和生存率与采用类似治疗策略的已发表系列研究以及采用盆腔外照射放疗和盆腔淋巴结取样而非淋巴结清扫术的研究结果进行了比较。
在192例病理分期为I期(国际妇产科联盟1988年分期)的子宫内膜腺癌患者中,178例接受了全盆腔淋巴结清扫术;159例可进行评估。15年总生存率为98%;10年和15年无病生存率分别为96%和94%。总体发病率为18%(29/159),中重度发病率为13%(21/159)。4.4%(7/159)的患者出现复发。在全盆腔淋巴结清扫术后,分级和肌层浸润并非无病生存的显著预测因素(分级,P = 0.42;分期,P = 0.67)。这些结果与类似研究以及盆腔外照射放疗研究的结果相比更具优势。
对于I期子宫内膜腺癌患者,采用全腹子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术、治疗性盆腔淋巴结清扫术和阴道近距离放疗进行初步手术治疗是一种可行且可能更优的选择。