Snadden D, Bain J
Tayside Centre for General Practice, University of Dundee, UK.
Med Educ. 1998 Jul;32(4):376-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00246.x.
The design, implementation and evaluation of an innovative course on education for a group of hospital doctors, general practitioners and dentists is described. It took place over five 2-day modules spread over 21 months. There were 33 participants and several tutors and external resources. The course was designed around group work and used a learner-centred agenda. Evaluation was by use of the nominal group technique during the course and by open questionnaires after 18 months. The course was successful in stimulating a number of activities and in developing the skills and confidence of the participants. Problem areas centred around the tension between the learner-centred agenda and the participants' need for structure. Courses such as this require good administration, as cohesive and supportive tutors' group, a clear statement of aims, even within a learner-centred framework, and the establishment of clear ground rules to allow the participants to feel safe. Without safety it is arguable that less challenging learning will occur.
本文描述了为一群医院医生、全科医生和牙医设计、实施和评估的一门创新教育课程。该课程为期21个月,分五个为期两天的模块进行。共有33名参与者以及多名导师和外部资源。该课程以小组工作为基础进行设计,并采用以学习者为中心的议程。课程期间通过名义小组技术进行评估,18个月后通过开放式问卷进行评估。该课程成功激发了多项活动,并培养了参与者的技能和信心。问题领域集中在以学习者为中心的议程与参与者对结构的需求之间的紧张关系上。这样的课程需要良好的管理、一个有凝聚力和支持性的导师团队、明确的目标陈述(即使是在以学习者为中心的框架内),以及建立明确的基本规则,让参与者感到安全。没有安全感,就有理由认为挑战性较小的学习将会发生。