• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下Burch阴道悬吊术。

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.

作者信息

Lose G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Glostrup County Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1998;168:29-33.

PMID:9744787
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the available information on laparoscopic colposuspension.

METHOD AND MATERIAL

One randomized controlled trial, four non-randomized comparative studies and ten open observational clinical series were reviewed.

RESULTS

The available information was generally poor characterized by the small size of series, considerable variation in surgical techniques, short follow-up and mainly subjective assessment of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic colposuspension has been shown to be technically feasible but the therapeutic usability of the procedure remains to be documented. There is an urgent need for some large, rigorous prospective randomized studies

摘要

目的

回顾关于腹腔镜下阴道悬吊术的现有信息。

方法与材料

回顾了一项随机对照试验、四项非随机对照研究以及十项开放性观察性临床系列研究。

结果

现有信息总体质量较差,其特点为研究样本量小、手术技术差异大、随访时间短且主要是对结果的主观评估。

结论

腹腔镜下阴道悬吊术已被证明在技术上是可行的,但该手术的治疗实用性仍有待证实。迫切需要一些大型、严谨的前瞻性随机研究。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.腹腔镜下Burch阴道悬吊术。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1998;168:29-33.
2
Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放式Burch阴道悬吊术:一项随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2006 Sep;113(9):999-1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01037.x.
3
Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.腹腔镜下Burch阴道悬吊术。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;19(4):314-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f75e.
4
A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence.无张力阴道吊带术与腹腔镜网片阴道悬吊术治疗女性原发性压力性尿失禁的成本效益分析
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(12):1485-90. doi: 10.1080/00016340601033584.
5
Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: which one should we choose?腹腔镜下与开放式阴道悬吊术:我们该选择哪一种?
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;19(4):345-9. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282442218.
6
Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放式阴道悬吊术——一项前瞻性随机对照试验的结果
BJOG. 2006 Sep;113(9):1007-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01035.x.
7
[Role of endoscopy in surgery for urinary incontinence].[内镜检查在尿失禁手术中的作用]
Ann Chir. 1996;50(10):896-905.
8
Comparison of health care costs for open Burch colposuspension, laparoscopic colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of female urinary incontinence.开放式Burch阴道悬吊术、腹腔镜阴道悬吊术及无张力阴道吊带治疗女性尿失禁的医疗费用比较
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(6):761-6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20417.
9
A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.一项针对压力性尿失禁女性的随机试验,比较使用缝线的开放式Burch阴道悬吊术与使用网片和吻合器的腹腔镜阴道悬吊术。
BJOG. 2004 Sep;111(9):974-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00220.x.
10
Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: a 14-year follow-up study.Burch阴道悬吊术的长期疗效:一项14年的随访研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Aug;84(8):767-72. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00731.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic surgery for female urinary incontinence: prudence shall prevail.女性尿失禁的腹腔镜手术:应谨慎行事。
JSLS. 1999 Oct-Dec;3(4):273-7.